Feminist Peace Activism 1915 and 2010: Are We Nearly There Yet?
Feminist Peace Activism 1915 and 2010: Are We Nearly There Yet?
复制标题
1915 年和 2010 年的女权和平行动：我们快到了吗？
DOI：
10.1111/pech.12010
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sharp I
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sharp I
1915 年，来自交战国和中立国的一千多名妇女齐聚海牙，抗议第一次世界大战。 1919 年，他们中的一些人再次在苏黎世聚会，讨论建设可持续和平的方法。本文重点关注人类安全和积极和平的概念，将这些活动家的性别和平愿景与联合国安理会第 1325 (2000) 号决议的基本原则进行比较，并考虑妇女参与正式和平谈判的障碍和阻碍是否已被克服。它还考虑了海牙妇女争取和平的工作是否受到人权话语的影响。这种比较有助于提高我们的历史理解，并揭示在此期间对战争、和平和性别的态度是如何发展的。自联合国安理会第 1325 号决议通过以来的经验表明，仅靠联合国决议并不能保证妇女有效参与建设和平。自2000年以来，冲突期间和冲突后未能解决基于性别的暴力、性贩运和强奸问题，这也表明人权话语的局限性，没有明确解决男性和女性经历之间的差异。
In 1915, over one thousand women from warring and neutral nations met at The Hague to protest against the First World War. In 1919, some of them met again in Zurich to discuss ways of building a sustainable peace. Focusing on the concepts of human security and positive peace, this article compares these activists' vision of a gendered peace with the principles underlying UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) and considers whether the barriers and obstacles to women's participation in formal peace negotiations have been overcome. It also considers whether the Hague women's work for peace was informed by a discourse of human rights. The comparison works to improve our historical understanding as well as revealing how attitudes to war, peace, and gender have developed over the intervening period. The experience since passage of UNSCR 1325 has shown that UN Resolutions alone do not guarantee women's effective inclusion in peacebuilding. The failure since 2000 to tackle gender‐based violence, sexual trafficking, and rape during and after conflict also shows the limitations of a human rights discourse that does not explicitly address the differences between men's and women's experiences.