Interesting practitioners in training in empirically supported treatments: research reviews versus case studies.
Interesting practitioners in training in empirically supported treatments: research reviews versus case studies.
复制标题
有趣的从业者接受经验支持的治疗培训：研究评论与案例研究。
DOI：
10.1002/jclp.20630
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
3
通讯作者：
Chambless,DianneL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stewart,RebeccaE;Chambless,DianneL
事实一再证明，临床医生更依赖于临床判断，而不是研究结果。我们假设，心理学家在实践中可能会更开放，采用经验支持的治疗（EST），如果结果与案例研究。私人执业的心理学家（N=742）被随机分配接受来自认知行为治疗（CBT）和药物治疗贪食症的随机对照试验数据的研究综述，CBT对虚构的贪食症患者的案例研究，或两者兼而有之。结果表明，列入案例的例子，使EST更引人注目，并在获得培训的临床医生的利益。尽管这些参与者接受了统计培训，但除了轶事案例信息之外，纳入统计信息对态度或培训意愿没有任何影响。© 2009 Wiley Periodicals，Inc. J Clin Psychol 66：1-23，2010.
It has been repeatedly demonstrated that clinicians rely more on clinical judgment than on research findings. We hypothesized that psychologists in practice might be more open to adopting empirically supported treatments (ESTs) if outcome results were presented with a case study. Psychologists in private practice (N=742) were randomly assigned to receive a research review of data from randomized controlled trials of cognitive‐behavioral treatment (CBT) and medication for bulimia, a case study of CBT for a fictional patient with bulimia, or both. Results indicated that the inclusion of case examples renders ESTs more compelling and interests clinicians in gaining training. Despite these participants' training in statistics, the inclusion of the statistical information had no influence on attitudes or training willingness beyond that of the anecdotal case information. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 66:1–23, 2010.