Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian
Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian
复制标题
Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian
DOI：
10.21143/jhp.vol43.no1.1508
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wahyu Wiriadinata
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wahyu Wiriadinata
本文件旨在回答关于印度尼西亚现行法律（即1999年关于根除腐败犯罪的第31号法律）规定的举证责任倒置的有效性程度的问题。那么，随之而来的一个问题是：在证明腐败犯罪案件中适用举证责任倒置能否预防或减少甚至完全消除印尼的腐败犯罪？本研究建立在罗斯科·磅的理论框架之上，他认为法律是社会工程的工具。Muchtar Kusumaatmadja引用了这一概念，他将其改编为印度尼西亚的条件，并将其转化为法律，作为社会工程的媒介，法律应作为改革和解决社区中出现的所有问题的媒介，包括腐败犯罪。证据制度的改革之一就是从传统的证据制度向反转制度的转变。本文采用了司法规范的方法，即通过研究法律和法律的科学文献/书籍中所载的立法，特别是与举证责任倒置有关的立法。然后，结果，在一个形式的司法方面，写在一个连续分析的形式。本研究的结论是对上述问题的回答，即：腐败犯罪具有 一直持续到现在在印尼。因此，1999年第31号法律第37条尚未有效根除腐败犯罪。因此，需要适用纯粹的举证责任倒置，避免官僚主义乱象的发生。
This paper was intended to answer a question on the extent of the effectiveness of a reversal burden of proof as stipulated in positive (prevailing) Indonesia law, that is, as provided for in Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption Crime. Then, a problem that rose next was: could the application of reversal burden of proof in proving a corruption crime case prevent or reduce or even eliminate totally corruption crimes in Indonesia? This research built on a theoretical frame of thought from Roscoe Pound, who maintains that law is a tool of social engineering. This concept was cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who adapted it to Indonesia conditions and transformed it to be law as a social engineering medium. Law should be made as a medium of reforming and resolving all problems that emerge in community, including corruption crimes. One of the things to reform is the law of proof system, that is, from a conventional proof system to a reversal system. This paper was written by a juridical-normative method, that is, by studying legislations, both contained in laws and in literature/books on legal science, particularly legislations relating to reversal burden of proof. Then, the results, in a form of juridical aspect, were written in a descriptive-analytical form. The conclusion of this research was an answer to the problems put forward above, that is: Corruption crimes have been occurring continuously till now in Indonesia. Thus, Law Number 31 of 1999, Article 37, has not been effective yet in eradicating corruption crimes. Therefore, it needs to apply a pure reversal burden of proof by avoiding the incidence of bureaucratic chaos.