The Right to the Smart City
The Right to the Smart City
复制标题
智慧城市的权利
DOI：
10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191002
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Willis K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Willis K
本章将结合列费夫尔的《城市权利》（1996 b）来理解智慧城市倡议是如何实施的，以及谁因此受益。虽然智慧城市提供了一种公民模式，但“实际存在的”智慧城市实际上重新配置了公民模式，使技术和数据工具化，从而加强了边缘化群体的排斥模式。因此，本章旨在了解公民如何参与智慧城市项目，以及它们是否会导致现有城市历史，物质和社会不平等的加剧。本章重点关注被智慧城市项目排除在外的一些人：城市穷人、街头商贩和生活在非正规住区的人，并探讨他们进入和参与城市的方式。在全球南方背景下，印度是实施国家级智慧城市计划的关键参与者，在钦奈市开展了研究，以调查印度智慧城市使命的规划和实施方式以及对边缘化社区的相应影响。本章认为，有必要认识到公民在社会和空间嵌入背景下使用满足其需求的技术和数据的各种日常、小规模方式的价值。通过这种方式，边缘化的人可能被赋予权力，在城市空间中拥有列费夫尔所描述的“对作品、参与和占有的权利”（1996年，第173页）。
This chapter works with Lefebvre’s “Right to the City”(1996b) to understand how a Smart City initiative was being implemented and as a consequence who benefitted. While a model of citizenship is offered in smart cities, the “actually existing” smart city in fact reconfigures models of citizenship in ways that instrumentalize technology and data that can reinforce the patterns of exclusion for marginalized groups. Therefore, this chapter aims to understand how citizens participate in smart city projects and whether they can in fact lead to the exacerbation of existing urban historical, material, and social inequalities. The chapter focuses on some of those excluded by smart city projects: the urban poor, street traders, and those who live in informal settlements and explores the way in which they access and participate in the city. In the Global South context, India is a key actor in implementing a national-level smart city program, and research was undertaken in the city of Chennai to investigate the way that the India Smart Cities Mission was being planned and implemented and the corresponding implications for marginalized communities. The chapter argues that there is a need to recognize the value of a range of everyday, small-scale ways in which citizens employ technologies and data that meet their needs in a social and spatially embedded context. In this way, marginalized people may be empowered to have what Lefebvre describes as “the right to the oeuvre, to participation and appropriation”(1996, p. 173) in urban space.