Comparison of contact conditions obtained by direct simulation with statistical analysis - Normally distributed isotropic surfaces -
Comparison of contact conditions obtained by direct simulation with statistical analysis - Normally distributed isotropic surfaces -
复制标题
直接模拟与统计分析获得的接触条件的比较 - 正态分布各向同性表面 -
DOI:
10.1088/2051-672x/aac072
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Michimasa Uchidate
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
多田一生,吉冨健一郎,餅田 正秋,宇根 篤暢;Michimasa Uchidate
In this study, with the aim of establishing a systematic knowledge on the impact of summit extraction methods and stochastic model selection in rough contact analysis, the contact area ratio (A r/A a) obtained by statistical contact models with different summit extraction methods was compared with a direct simulation using the boundary element method (BEM). Fifty areal topography datasets with different autocorrelation functions in terms of the power index and correlation length were used for investigation. The non-causal 2D auto-regressive model which can generate datasets with specified parameters was employed in this research. Three summit extraction methods, Nayak's theory, 8-point analysis and watershed segmentation, were examined. With regard to the stochastic model, Bhushan's model and BGT (Bush-Gibson-Thomas) model were applied. The values of A r/A a from the stochastic models tended to be smaller than BEM. The discrepancy between the Bhushan's model with the 8-point analysis and BEM was slightly smaller than Nayak's theory. The results with the watershed segmentation was similar to those with the 8-point analysis. The impact of the Wolf pruning on the discrepancy between the stochastic analysis and BEM was not very clear. In case of the BGT model which employs surface gradients, good quantitative agreement against BEM was obtained when the Nayak's bandwidth parameter was large.