Using geographic information science to evaluate legal restrictions on freight transportation routing in disruptive scenarios
Using geographic information science to evaluate legal restrictions on freight transportation routing in disruptive scenarios
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijcip.2016.12.001
复制
发表时间：
2017-06-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Tuttle, Mark A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fialkoff, Marc R.;Omitaomu, Olufemi A.;Tuttle, Mark A.
灾害是有后果的，货物运输也不能幸免于这些后果。在灾害发生后，规划者和决策者必须利用稀缺的资源，并在法律的框架内开展工作，以确保无法运营的基础设施资产恢复正常运营。就货物运输而言，由于基础设施资产无法运作而导致的货物改道所带来的挑战超出了有形层面，这些挑战包括克服多式联运货物运输所涉及的一些法律的障碍。本文提出了一种应用运输路线分析，以评估路线的选择，在灾害期间的货物运输。本文还评估了1920年《商船法》（又称《琼斯法》）对美国沃茨内沿海点之间短途海运的法律的影响。以飓风桑迪期间关闭的纽约港和新泽西港为例，进行了各种模式研究，突出了不同的路线，并深入了解了琼斯法案所施加的模式限制的挑战。(C)© 2016 Elsevier B.V.版权所有。
Disasters have consequences and freight transportation is not immune to these consequences. In the aftermath of disasters, planners and policymakers have to utilize scarce resources and work within legal frameworks to ensure that inoperable infrastructure assets return to normal operations. In the case of freight transportation, the challenges associated with freight rerouting due to inoperable infrastructure assets are beyond the physical dimension the challenges include overcoming some legal barriers involved with inter modal freight transportation. This paper presents an application of transportation routing analysis to evaluate routing options for freight transportation during disasters. The paper also evaluates the legal implications of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (also known as the Jones Act) on short sea shipping between coastal points in U.S. territorial waters. Using the closure of the Port of New York and New Jersey during Hurricane Sandy as a case study, various modal studies are performed that highlight the different routes and provide insights into the challenges of the modal restrictions imposed by the Jones Act. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.