“Mission Civilisatrice”
“Mission Civilisatrice”
复制标题
“文明使命”
DOI：
10.1525/irqr.2009.1.4.491
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Ivy Haoyin Hsieh
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mirka Koro;Marco Gemignani;Shane S. Chaplin;Sharon B Hayes;Ivy Haoyin Hsieh
在本文中，我们对特定认识论、方法论和研究实践以及新殖民主义发现、发展和解释证据的实践的所谓优越性提出了质疑。此外，我们说明了如何殖民化的证据是通过话语的统治，主观化，和文明制定。我们认为，这些实践和论述旨在建立更统一、更狭窄、更容易控制的科学领域。作为回应，我们认为，统治和霸权体系的瓦解可能是科学家致力于跨越其实践的政治和方法论界限的结果。证据不是关于特定类型的数据或知识，而是关于研究人员如何有意识地和负责任地在各种认识论，方法论和经验空间中运作。因此，证据不能被定义;它只能在特定的文化和认识论背景下被描述。
In this paper, we take issue with the supposed superiority of specific epistemologies, methodologies, and research practices, as well as the neocolonialist practices of discovery, development and interpretation of evidence. Furthermore, we illustrate how the colonization of evidence is enacted through discourses of domination, subjectivication, and civilization. We maintain that these practices and discourses intend to establish more unified, narrow, and easily controlled fields of science. In reaction, we argue that the dismantling of systems of domination and hegemony may result from the scientists' commitment to cross the political and methodological boundaries of their practice. Evidence is not about a particular type of data or knowledge, but about how researchers consciously and responsibly operate in various epistemological, methodological, and empirical spaces. Thus, evidence cannot be defined; it can only be described within specific cultural and epistemological contexts.