Divergent Matrix-Remodeling Strategies Distinguish Developmental from Neoplastic Mammary Epithelial Cell Invasion Programs.
Divergent Matrix-Remodeling Strategies Distinguish Developmental from Neoplastic Mammary Epithelial Cell Invasion Programs.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.devcel.2018.08.025
复制
发表时间:
2018-10-22
影响因子:
11.8
通讯作者:
Weiss SJ
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Feinberg TY;Zheng H;Liu R;Wicha MS;Yu SM;Weiss SJ
Metastasizing breast carcinoma cells have been hypothesized to mobilize tissue-invasive activity by co-opting the proteolytic systems employed by normal mammary epithelial cells undergoing branching morphogenesis. However, the critical effectors underlying morphogenesis remain unidentified and their relationship to breast cancer invasion programs have yet to be established. Here we identify the membrane-anchored matrix metalloproteinase, Mmp14/MT1-MMP, but not the closely related proteinase, Mmp15/MT2-MMP, as the dominant proteolytic effector of both branching morphogenesis and carcinoma cell invasion in vivo. Unexpectedly, however, epithelial cell-specific targeting of Mmp14/MT1-MMP in the normal mammary gland fails to impair branching, whereas deleting the proteinase in carcinoma cells abrogates invasion, preserves matrix architecture and completely blocks metastasis. By contrast, in the normal mammary gland, extracellular matrix remodeling and morphogenesis are ablated only when Mmp14/MT1-MMP expression is specifically deleted from the periductal stroma. Together, these findings uncover the overlapping, but divergent strategies that underlie developmental versus neoplastic matrix remodeling programs. Breast carcinoma cells are thought to co-opt proteolytic systems employed during developmental branching morphogenesis. Feinberg et al. show that these processes indeed both depend on the same protease, MT1-MMP, but that normal mammary gland development requires protease activity in the stroma, whereas in cancer, the carcinoma cells themselves drive the invasion program.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Peng D;Tanikawa T;Li W;Zhao L;Vatan L;Szeliga W;Wan S;Wei S;Wang Y;Liu Y;Staroslawska E;Szubstarski F;Rolinski J;Grywalska E;Stanisławek A;Polkowski W;Kurylcio A;Kleer C;Chang AE;Wicha M;Sabel M;Zou W;Kryczek I
通讯作者:
Kryczek I
影响因子:
8
作者:
Lodillinsky, C.;Infante, E.;Chavrier, P.
通讯作者:
Chavrier, P.
影响因子:
64.5
作者:
Cheung KJ;Gabrielson E;Werb Z;Ewald AJ
通讯作者:
Ewald AJ
影响因子:
11.4
作者:
Gutierrez-Fernandez, Ana;Soria-Valles, Clara;Lopez-Otin, Carlos
通讯作者:
Lopez-Otin, Carlos
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Fischer KR;Durrans A;Lee S;Sheng J;Li F;Wong ST;Choi H;El Rayes T;Ryu S;Troeger J;Schwabe RF;Vahdat LT;Altorki NK;Mittal V;Gao D
通讯作者:
Gao D