Lying and Theory of Mind: A Meta-Analysis

Lying and Theory of Mind: A Meta-Analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/cdev.13535
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-18
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Imuta, Kana
Imuta, Kana
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lee, Jia Ying Sarah;Imuta, Kana

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项荟萃分析通过整合 81 项研究的结果,调查了撒谎与心理理论 (ToM) 之间的联系,这些研究涉及来自 14 种不同集体主义和个人主义文化的 7,826 名 2 至 14 岁儿童。总体而言,存在较小但显着的正相关性 (r = .23)。检查了四个主要调节因素:说谎的方面(理解、煽动生产、自发生产、维护);谎言的效价(反社会的,亲社会的); ToM 的类型(一阶、二阶);和文化(集体主义、个人主义)。说谎的方面和 ToM 类型是重要的调节因素。 ToM 与说谎的各个方面均呈正相关,但与谎言维持的相关性最强,而与自发说谎的相关性最弱。一阶 ToM 和二阶 ToM 都与说谎呈正相关,但前者的联系更强。
This meta-analysis investigated the link between lying and theory-of-mind (ToM) by integrating findings from 81 studies involving 7,826 children between 2 and 14 years of age from 14 different collectivist and individualist cultures. Overall, there was a small, significant positive association (r = .23). Four main moderators were examined: facet of lying (understanding, instigated production, spontaneous production, maintenance); valence of lies (antisocial, prosocial); type of ToM (first-order, second-order); and culture (collectivist, individualist). Facet of lying and type of ToM were significant moderators. ToM was positively related to all facets of lying, but most strongly linked to lie maintenance and weakest for spontaneous production. Both first-order and second-order ToM were positively related to lying, but the link was stronger for the former.