Crisis, Climate Change and Comitology: Policy Dismantling Via the Backdoor?
Crisis, Climate Change and Comitology: Policy Dismantling Via the Backdoor?
复制标题
危机、气候变化和委员会学：通过后门废除政策？
DOI：
10.1111/jcms.12996
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Paul Tobin
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Burns;Paul Tobin
欧盟被誉为气候先锋。然而，欧盟一直受到危机的困扰，这对气候雄心可能产生负面影响。对1998年至2015年欧盟气候立法的分析和编码显示，尽管自危机爆发以来，气候政策制定的速度有所增加，但这些政策的雄心却有所减弱。欧盟一级的技术政策文书（委员会）-“授权和执行法案”-与根据“普通立法程序"通过的立法一起进行分析。如果按照条约的规定实施，技术性的DIA措施不应影响政策目标，但事实上，在危机时期，DIA措施被更频繁地使用，并在四分之三的政策弱化案例中使用，这表明气候政策的轻微拆除正在欧盟层面发生，但通过后门。
The European Union (EU) is reputed to be a climate pioneer. However, the EU has been beset by crises, with potentially negative consequences for climate ambition. Analysis and coding of EU climate legislation between 1998 and 2015 reveal that while the rate of climate policy creation has increased since the onset of the crisis, the ambition of these policies has waned. Technical policy instruments (comitology) at the EU level – ‘Delegated and Implementing Acts’ (DIA) – are analysed alongside legislation adopted under the ‘Ordinary Legislative Procedure’ (OLP). If applied as indicated in the treaties, technical DIA measures should not influence policy ambition, but in fact during the crisis era, DIA measures were used more frequently, and used in three out of the four cases of policy weakening, suggesting that minor dismantling of climate policy is taking place at EU level, but via the backdoor.
共同决策对环境有利吗？
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
Burns C
通讯作者：
Burns C
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Burns C
通讯作者：
Burns C