Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity
Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/10437797.1997.10778862
复制
发表时间：
1997-12-01
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Drisko, JW
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Drisko, JW
本文探讨了在社会工作中进行定性研究和评价定性研究报告的六个标准：(1)确定所选择的哲学/认识论，(2)确定受众和目标，(3)确定研究方法，(4)确定偏见，(5)维护社会工作伦理，(6)保证结论与研究哲学、目标和提出的数据之间的一致性。自始至终，作者强调有必要在所有定性研究中检查潜在的不确定数据。这些标准旨在指导定性研究人员，告知定性研究方法的教学，并帮助审查定性研究报告。
This article examines six criteria for conducting qualitative research and evaluating qualitative research reports in social work: (1) identification of the chosen philosophy/epistemology, (2) identification of audience and objectives, (3) specification of the study method, (4) identification of biases, (5) maintenance of social work ethics, and (6) assurance of consistency between conclusions and study philosophy, objectives, and presented data. Throughout, the author emphasizes the need to examine potentially disconfirming data in all qualitative research. These criteria are intended to guide qualitative researchers, inform the teaching of qualitative research methods, and aid review of qualitative research reports.