Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study.
Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2-4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/jnnp-2021-327480
复制
发表时间:
2022-03
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Stites T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ferrari MD;Reuter U;Goadsby PJ;Paiva da Silva Lima G;Mondal S;Wen S;Tenenbaum N;Pandhi S;Lanteri-Minet M;Stites T
To evaluate individual and group long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab in individuals with episodic migraine (EM) for whom 2–4 prior preventatives had failed. Participants completing the 12-week double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the LIBERTY study could continue into an open-label extension phase (OLEP) receiving erenumab 140 mg monthly for up to 3 years. Main outcomes assessed at week 112 were: ≥50%, ≥75% and 100% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) as group responder rate and individual responder rates, MMD change from baseline, safety and tolerability. Overall 240/246 (97.6%) entered the OLEP (118 continuing erenumab, 122 switching from placebo). In total 181/240 (75.4%) reached 112 weeks, 24.6% discontinued, mainly due to lack of efficacy (44.0%), participant decision (37.0%) and adverse events (AEs; 12.0%). The ≥50% responder rate was 57.2% (99/173) at 112 weeks. Of ≥50% responders at the end of the DBTP, 36/52 (69.2%) remained responders at ≥50% and 22/52 (42.3%) at >80% of visits. Of the non-responders at the end of the DBTP, 60/185 (32.4%) converted to ≥50% responders in at least half the visits and 24/185 (13.0%) converted to ≥50% responders in >80% of visits. Change from baseline at 112 weeks in mean (SD) MMD was −4.2 (5.0) days. Common AEs (≥10%) were nasopharyngitis, influenza and back pain. Efficacy was sustained over 112 weeks in individuals with difficult-to-treat EM for whom 2–4 prior migraine preventives had failed. Erenumab treatment was safe and well tolerated, in-line with previous studies. NCT03096834
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Tepper, Stewart J.;Ashina, Messoud;Mikol, Daniel D.
通讯作者:
Mikol, Daniel D.
DOI:
10.1124/jpet.115.227793
发表时间:
2016-01-01
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Shi, Licheng;Lehto, Sonya G.;Xu, Cen
通讯作者:
Xu, Cen
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Raffaelli, Bianca;Kalantzis, Rea;Reuter, Uwe
通讯作者:
Reuter, Uwe
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Goadsby, Peter J.;Paemeleire, Koen;Mikol, Daniel D.
通讯作者:
Mikol, Daniel D.
影响因子:
48
作者:
Mulleners, Wim M.;Kim, Byung-Kun;Detke, Holland C.
通讯作者:
Detke, Holland C.