Comparison of Timing Measurement Methods of Dual-Ended Readout Scintillator Array PET Detectors
Comparison of Timing Measurement Methods of Dual-Ended Readout Scintillator Array PET Detectors
复制标题
双端读出闪烁体阵列PET探测器计时测量方法比较
DOI:
10.1109/trpms.2024.3382990
复制
发表时间:
2024
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Yongfeng Yang
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ming Niu;Z. Kuang;Xiaohui Wang;N. Ren;Ziru Sang;T. Sun;Zheng Liu;Zhanli Hu;Zheng Gu;Yongfeng Yang
The main focus of this work is to compare different timing measurement methods of individual silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) arrays and dual-ended readout PET detectors. Two lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystal arrays with <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.10\times 3.10\times 20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{3}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> crystals, enhanced specular reflector (ESR), and barium sulfate (BaSO4) reflector and one LYSO crystal array with <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.88\times 1.88\times 20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{3}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> crystals and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rm BaSO_{4}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> reflector with dual-ended read out by <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$8\times 8$ </tex-math></inline-formula> SiPM arrays of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3\times 3$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> active pixel area were measured. Signals of the SiPM arrays were processed individually using 64 channel PETsys TOFPET2 application specific integrated circuits designed for time-of-flight PET applications. For the SiPM arrays, an energy square-weighted average timing method using the timings of the fastest 2 SiPM pixels was found to provide the best-coincidence timing resolutions (CTRs). For the dual-ended readout detectors, the method of using the energy-weighted average timings of the two SiPM arrays provided the best CTR of 234 ps for the detector using <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.10\times 3.10\times 20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{3}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> crystals and ESR reflector, 239 ps for the detector using <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3.10\times 3.10\times 20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{3}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> crystals and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rm BaSO_{4}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> reflector, and 275 ps for the detector using <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.88\times 1.88\times 20$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\mathrm { mm}}^{3}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> crystals and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\rm BaSO_{4}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> reflector for an energy window of 410–610 keV. The dual-ended readout detectors developed in this work provide better CTRs than those of single-ended readout detectors and a high-3-D position resolution which can be used in the future to develop whole-body PET scanners to simultaneously achieve uniform high-spatial resolution, high sensitivity and high-timing resolution.