Public policy framework supporting "mobility-as-a-service" implementation
Public policy framework supporting "mobility-as-a-service" implementation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100905
复制
发表时间：
2020-11-01
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Macario, Rosario
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lajas, Renata;Macario, Rosario
世界人口预测增长，人口老龄化，城市化和拥堵水平的提高给城市交通系统带来了一些挑战。数字化的大趋势正在重塑全球的生活，而与此同时，“用户”正在沿着协作消费蓬勃发展。在这种新的移动生态系统中，“移动即服务”（“MaaS”）作为一种潜在的移动性颠覆而出现，本文以芬兰的“MaaS”生态系统为灵感，旨在提出一个分两个阶段的“移动即服务公共政策框架”。首先构建“MaaS”概念，寻找核心特征，它的关系，导致它的重新概念化和拓扑建议。其次，从政策工具、利益相关者群体和不同的城市交通管理决策层面出发，提出了一个公共政策框架。作者认为，理解与城市交通系统密切相关的决策的性质，设计和实施一个连贯有效的政策框架，其中，为实现有关“MaaS”的政策决策而选择的政策工具应首先考虑确定“MaaS”概念的基础支柱，从而指导相应的政策设计过程。如果“MaaS”被视为移动性管理工具，它可以成为重新定义公共交通及其融资的一个机会。
World population forecasted growth, ageing population, rising urbanization and congestion levels carry several challenges inside urban mobility systems. The digitalization megatrend is reshaping lives worldwide while at the same time "Usership" is thriving along collaborative consumption. "Mobility-as-a-Service" ("MaaS") emerges as a potential mobility disruption, in this new mobility ecosystem.Inspired in Finland's "MaaS" ecosystem, this paper aims to propose a "Mobility as a Service Public Policy Framework" with a two-stage approach. First structuring the "MaaS" concept, looking for the core features, its relations, that leads to its reconceptualization and a topology proposal. Secondly, a public policy framework is proposed, considering the policy instruments, indicative group of stakeholders responsible and the different urban mobility management decision levels.The authors argue that is fundamental to understand the nature of decisions which are intimately connected with the Urban Mobility system, to design and implement a coherent and effective policy framework, where the policy tools chosen to materialize policy decisions regarding "MaaS" should first consider the identification of the founding pillars of the "MaaS" concept, guiding the process of policy design accordingly.If "MaaS" is considered a Mobility Management tool, it can constitute an opportunity to redefine public transport and its financing.