High Doses of Daunorubicin during Induction Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.

High Doses of Daunorubicin during Induction Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Clinical Trials.
复制标题

新诊断急性髓系白血病诱导治疗期间的高剂量柔红霉素:前瞻性临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0125612
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Chen J
Chen J
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gong Q;Zhou L;Xu S;Li X;Zou Y;Chen J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

The right dose of daunorubicin (DNR) for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is uncertain. Previous trials have shown conflicting results concerning the efficacy of high or low doses of daunorubicin to induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to resolve this controversial issue. We compared the efficacy and safety of high doses of daunorubicin (HD-DNR) and traditional low doses of daunorubicin (LD-DNR) or idarubicin (IDA) during induction therapy of newly diagnosed AML. Data of 3,824 patients from 1,796 articles in the literature were retrieved and six randomized controlled trials were analyzed. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS). The secondary outcomes included complete remission (CR), relapse, and toxicity. The meta-analysis results suggest that comparing HD-DNR with LD-DNR, there were significant differences in CR (RR = 1.19, 95%CI[1.12,1.18], p<0.00001), OS(HR = 0.88, 95%CI[0.79,0.99], p = 0.002), and EFS (HR = 0.86, 95%CI [0.74, 1.00], p = 0.008), but not in DFS, relapse, and toxicity. There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes between HD-DNR and IDA. The analysis indicates that compared with LD-DNR, HD-DNR can significantly improve CR, OS and EFS but not DFS, and did not increase occurrence of relapse and toxicity.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
发表时间: 2009-07-21
期刊: PLoS medicine
影响因子: 15.8
作者:
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者: PRISMA Group
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90181-c
发表时间: 1991-01-01
影响因子: 8.4
作者:
MANDELLI, F;PETTI, MC;RESEGOTTI, L
通讯作者: RESEGOTTI, L
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-8-16
发表时间: 2007-06-07
期刊: Trials
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Tierney JF;Stewart LA;Ghersi D;Burdett S;Sydes MR
通讯作者: Sydes MR
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.23.2652
发表时间: 2010-02-10
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Pautas, Cecile;Merabet, Fatiha;Castaigne, Sylvie
通讯作者: Castaigne, Sylvie
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.22.9088
发表时间: 2010-02-01
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Burnett, Alan K.;Hills, Robert K.;Wheatley, Keith
通讯作者: Wheatley, Keith