SIGCHI Outstanding Dissertation Award: Evaluating Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies in Co-Design
SIGCHI Outstanding Dissertation Award: Evaluating Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies in Co-Design
复制标题
SIGCHI 杰出论文奖：利用协同设计技术评估自闭症儿童的经历
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Katta Spiel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Katta Spiel
自闭症儿童可用的许多技术在功能上集中于自闭症诊断的医学特征。通常，这些技术并不面向其特定的意义制造模式，而是面向由神经主导社会定义的结果行为[7]。然后，这些技术也根据驱动其设计的外在动机进行评估。然而，最近，越来越多的启发式设计（PD）项目与自闭症儿童一起创造技术，尽管大多数仍然停留在自闭症的医学观点上。因此，缺乏对自闭症儿童参与式设计的研究，旨在开发反映他们内在兴趣，整体福祉的技术，并考虑他们对这些技术的具体体验。在人机交互（HCI）的研究领域中，经验的建设性概念依赖于移情作为经验驱动评估的核心组成部分[2]。然而，自闭症患者感知世界的方式不同，因此，与非自闭症研究人员相比，他们对世界的理解也不同[1]。当与儿童一起工作时，这种差异变得特别明显，他们的生活世界与成年研究人员的生活世界截然不同。虽然同理心是评估自闭症儿童经历的核心要求，但我的工作表明，研究人员不能仅仅依靠他们的同理心。因此，评估这些经验需要一个结构化的过程，捕获多个视图[6]。
Many technologies available to autistic children functionally focus on the medical characteristics of a diagnosis of autism. All too often, these technologies are not oriented towards their specific modes of sense-making, but rather towards an outcome behaviour defined by a neurotypically dominant society [7]. These technologies are then also evaluated according to the extrinsic motivations driving their design. Recently, though, more and more Participatory Design (PD) projects create technologies together with autistic children, albeit still mostly remaining in a medicalised view of autism. Hence, there is a lack of research into participatory design with autistic children aiming to develop technologies that reflect their intrinsic interests, holistic wellbeing and considers the embodied experiences they have with these technologies. Constructive notions of experience in the research field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) rely on empathy as a core component of experience-driven evaluations [2]. However, autistic individuals perceive the world differently and, hence, make sense of it differently than non-autistic researchers [1]. This divide becomes especially pronounced when working with children, whose life worlds vastly differ from those of adult researchers. While empathy is a core requirement for the evaluation of the experience of autistic children, my work shows that researchers cannot rely solely on their empathy. Hence, evaluating these experiences requires a structured process capturing multiple views [6].