Entrepreneurial university dynamics: Structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system

Entrepreneurial university dynamics: Structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system
复制标题

创业型大学动态:斯坦福大学创新体系中的结构性矛盾、相对剥夺和制度形成

DOI:
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.019
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
12
通讯作者:
E. Albats
E. Albats
中科院分区:
管理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
H. Etzkowitz;Eloïse Germain;Jisoo Keel;C. Kumar;Kaden Nelson Smith;E. Albats

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章有助于对创业型大学的辩论。我们利用斯坦福大学最近的发展作为一个实验室,探讨创业型大学的过渡,建议他们的相关性,考虑采用这种模式的学术机构。以斯坦福大学和硅谷之间的关系为例,人们看到了大学作为技术创新推动者的作用。然而,创业型大学的发展路径却不为人所知,即使是在斯坦福大学这样一个标志性的案例中也是如此。斯坦福大学和硅谷之间出现了一条鸿沟,这是因为他们假设创新是一种自由放任的现象,尽管他们与硅谷之前的公司关系密切,而且最近出现了思科和谷歌等标志性公司。作为回应,建立了一系列转化和创新支持机制,提供了“中间纽带”,在结构化的矛盾状态下将学术界和商业界联系起来。
This article contributes to the debate over the entrepreneurial university. We utilize recent developments at Stanford as a laboratory to explore the entrepreneurial university transition, suggesting their relevance to academic institutions considering adopting this model. Exemplified by the relationship between Stanford University and Silicon Valley a vision emerged of the role of the university as a promoter of technological innovation. However, the development pathway of the entrepreneurial university is ill understood, even at Stanford, an iconic case. A gap opened up between Stanford and the Valley, due to an assumption of innovation as a laissez-faire phenomenon, despite close relations with firms that pre-dated Silicon Valley, and the more recent emergence of iconic firms, like CISCO and Google, from the university. In response, a series of translational and innovation support mechanisms have been founded, providing “intermediate ties” that link the academic and business worlds in a state of structured ambivalence.