Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one?
Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0146167205278307
复制
发表时间：
2005-12-01
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Choe, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Klohnen, EC;Weller, JA;Choe, M
鉴于最近的证据表明，多个附件模型，我们研究了组织和预测能力的一般和关系特定的附件表示在两个样本中使用两种不同的附件模型的措施。关于特定关系模型之间的关联，同伴模型（浪漫的伴侣和朋友）和父母模型（母亲和父亲）彼此之间比任何其他模型更相似，焦虑/自我模型表征在各种关系中比回避/其他模型表征更一致。在一般模型与具体模型之间的联系方面，浪漫模型和朋友模型对一般模型的贡献最大，并且是独立的，而浪漫关系卷入则调节了浪漫模型对一般模型的重要性。关于多个模型的差异预测能力，一般，浪漫的合作伙伴，和母亲的依恋作出了独特的贡献，幸福指标，关系的结果，但是，只预测个人的相应的关系特定的模型。成人依恋的测量和概念化的影响进行了讨论。
Given recent evidence for multiple attachment models, we examined the organization and Predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment representations in two samples using two distinct measures of attachment models. With regard to associations among relationship-specific models, peer models (romantic Partner and friend) and parental models (mother and father) were more similar to each other than to any other models, and anxiety/self model representations were more consistent across relationships than avoidance/other-model representations. With regard to links between general and specific models, romantic and friend models made the strongest and independent contributions to general models, and romantic relationship involvement moderated the importance of romantic models to general models. With regard to differential predictive power of multiple models, general, romantic partner, and mother attachment made unique contributions to well-being indicators; relationship outcomes, however, were only predicted by individuals' corresponding relationship-specific models. Implications for the measurement and conceptualization of adult attachment are discussed.