A qualitative content analysis of environmental impact assessment in Indonesia: a case study of nickel smelter processing
A qualitative content analysis of environmental impact assessment in Indonesia: a case study of nickel smelter processing
复制标题
印度尼西亚环境影响评价定性内容分析：以镍冶炼加工为例
DOI：
10.1080/14615517.2019.1672452
复制
发表时间：
2019
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Nishikizawa Shigeo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kurniawan Ali Rahmat;Murayama Takehiko;Nishikizawa Shigeo
印度尼西亚的环境影响评估（EIA）已经建立了36年多。在此期间，环评制度的演变反映了政治和官僚主义的变化。然而，环评程序目前的执行情况和成效仍未得到充分了解。本研究旨在检讨环评工作的实施情况，按程序评估环评工作的成效，并提出建议。为了检验环境影响评估的有效性，我们根据标准对镍冶炼厂的环境影响报告（EIR）进行了评估和比较。结果表明，筛选和范围界定过程在科学数据库的可用性、成本和研究时间方面遇到了问题。由于信息渠道的限制和讨论过程的弱点，公众参与并不有效。我们发现评估和监测过程之间的同步不足。环评报告指出了冗余、不一致和模糊。我们建议从政治上加强政府在环评预算、人力资源和决策程序方面制定可持续政策的意愿。
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in Indonesia has been established for over 36 years. During this time, the EIA system has evolved to reflect both political and bureaucracy changes. However, the current implementation and effectiveness of the EIA process have not yet to be fully understood. This study aims to review the current implementation of EIA, to assess the effectiveness of EIA process procedurally, and to provide recommendations. In order to examine the effectiveness of EIA, we evaluate and compare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) of nickel smelters against criteria. The results indicate that the screening and scoping process encountered problems in terms of scientific database availability, cost, and time of the study. Public participation was not effective due to the constraints of information channeling and weaknesses of the discussion process. We found insufficient synchronization between the evaluation and monitoring processes. EIA reporting indicated redundancy, inconsistency, and ambiguity. We recommend the political reinforcement of the will of the government to establish sustainable policy in terms of budgeting, human resources, and procedure of decision-making process in EIA.