Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion

Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.036
复制
发表时间:
2012-12-01
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

卵巢储备减少(DOR)目前没有统一的定义,因为该术语可能指三种相关但明显不同的结果:卵母细胞质量、卵母细胞数量或生殖潜力。由于样本量小,研究设计、分析和结果之间存在异质性,以及缺乏有效的结果测量,有关卵巢储备测试性能的现有证据受到限制。(C) 2015年由美国生殖医学学会发布。)目前,卵巢储备减少(DOR)没有统一的定义,因为该术语可能指三种相关但明显不同的结果:卵母细胞质量、卵母细胞数量或生殖潜力。由于样本量小,研究设计、分析和结果之间存在异质性,以及缺乏有效的结果测量,有关卵巢储备测试性能的现有证据受到限制。[j] .中国农业科学(英文版),2012;22(1):1 - 4。(C) 2012年,美国生殖医学学会。)在www.asrm.org/elearn获得与本文件相关的在线CME学分
Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures. ((C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)Currently, there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures. (Fertil Steril (R) 2012;98:1407-15. (C) 2012 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.) Earn online CME credit related to this document at www.asrm.org/elearn