Should we worry about filter bubbles?

Should we worry about filter bubbles?
复制标题

DOI:
10.14763/2016.1.401
复制
发表时间:
2016-03-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Helberger, Natali
Helberger, Natali
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Borgesius, Frederik J. Zuiderveen;Trilling, Damian;Helberger, Natali

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

一些人担心,个性化交流可能会导致信息茧或过滤气泡。例如,一个个性化的新闻网站可以根据用户的(假定的)政治兴趣,为保守派或自由派媒体项目提供更多的突出位置。因此,用户可能只会遇到有限范围的政治观点。我们综合了对自我选择个性化的程度和影响的实证研究,其中人们主动选择他们接收的内容,以及预先选择的个性化,其中算法为用户个性化内容,而无需任何刻意的用户选择。我们的结论是,目前几乎没有经验证据证明对过滤气泡有任何担忧。
Some fear that personalised communication can lead to information cocoons or filter bubbles. For instance, a personalised news website could give more prominence to conservative or liberal media items, based on the (assumed) political interests of the user. As a result, users may encounter only a limited range of political ideas. We synthesise empirical research on the extent and effects of self-selected personalisation, where people actively choose which content they receive, and pre-selected personalisation, where algorithms personalise content for users without any deliberate user choice. We conclude that at present there is little empirical evidence that warrants any worries about filter bubbles.