Reliability and Learning Factors Associated with Cognitive Tests
Reliability and Learning Factors Associated with Cognitive Tests
复制标题
与认知测试相关的可靠性和学习因素
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1971
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lawrence Obrist
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Joseph J. Fleishman;E. R. Dusek;James Sullivan;Mark Cohan;Morton DeMott;Lawrence Obrist
从法国等国选取21个纸笔测试，对信度、实践效果和因素负荷进行了调查。认知因素参考测试试剂盒。采用简单易行的标准来选择待研究的试验。这些结果有助于选择那些在研究气候和环境变量对行为的影响时可能最有用的认知能力测试。此类研究通常需要在几天内对一小群Ss进行重复测量，因此，不将实践和环境影响混为一谈是极其重要的。测试的重测信度总体较好；其中16项测试的Pearson r为。8或更大。其中8项测试在6次试验中显示出足够的稳定性，表明它们可以在极端环境下重复使用，而不会因实践而严重混淆。作者警告说，在极端条件和正常环境条件下，因素定义可能不一样。
Reliability, practice effects, and factor loadings were investigated for 21 paper-and-pencil tests selected from the French, et al. Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors. Criteria of brevity and ease of administration were employed for selecting tests to be studied. The results are helpful in selecting those tests of cognitive abilities which may be most useful in studies of the effects of climatic and environmental variables on behavior. Such studies frequently require repeated measurements on a small group of Ss over several days, thus making it extremely important that practice and environmental effects not be confounded. Test-retest reliabilities of the tests were generally quite good; 16 of the tests had a Pearson r of .8 or greater. Eight of the tests showed enough stability in mean performances over six trials to suggest that they may be used repetitively under environmental extremes without serious confounding by practice. The authors caution that factor definitions may not be the same under extreme conditions and under normal environmental conditions.