Framing the housing crisis: How think-tanks frame politics and science to advance policy agendas
Framing the housing crisis: How think-tanks frame politics and science to advance policy agendas
复制标题
构建住房危机：智囊团如何构建政治和科学以推进政策议程
DOI：
10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.05.015
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
Chris Foye
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chris Foye
在英格兰，智囊团在制定负担不起的住房的原因方面发挥了至关重要的作用。然而，智库的逻辑，以及它们以这种方式公开干预的原因，仍然不清楚。本文借鉴皮埃尔·布尔迪厄的社会场域理论，试图理解智库的建构策略。基于对三个智库五年公共干预的定量和定性文本分析，本文论证了智库采取的框架战略--即它推动的因果叙事和政策议程，以及它用来推动这一战略的手段--如何部分地通过它作为一个组织拥有的资本的数量和类型，以及它与科学、政治和媒体领域的各自联系来解释。在这样做的过程中，这篇论文阐明了一些关键的结构逻辑，这些逻辑解释了为什么经济适用房危机的一些框架在公共和政治领域主导了其他框架。
In England, think-tanks have played a crucial role in framing the causes of unaffordable housing. Yet the logics of think-tanks, the reasons why they intervene publicly in the way that they do, remain unclear. Drawing on the social field theory of Pierre Bourdieu, this paper seeks to understand the framing strategies of think-tanks. Based on quantitative and qualitative textual analysis of five years’ worth of public interventions from three think-tanks, this paper demonstrates how the framing strategy adopted by a think-tank – that is the causal narrative and policy agenda it promotes, and the means it uses to promote it- can be partly explained by the amount and types of capital it possesses as an organisation, and its respective ties to the fields of science, politics and the media. In doing so, the paper illuminates some of the key structural logics which explain why some framings of the affordable housing crisis dominate others in the public and political domains.