CITATION ANALYSES AS INDICATORS OF THE USE OF SERIALS: A COMPARISON OF RANKED TITLE LISTS PRODUCED BY CITATION COUNTING AND FROM USE DATA
CITATION ANALYSES AS INDICATORS OF THE USE OF SERIALS: A COMPARISON OF RANKED TITLE LISTS PRODUCED BY CITATION COUNTING AND FROM USE DATA
复制标题
引用分析作为连续出版物使用的指标：通过引用计数和使用数据生成的排名标题列表的比较
DOI：
10.1108/eb026612
复制
发表时间：
1976
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Pauline A. Scales
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pauline A. Scales
根据收到的引用数量排名的期刊列表经常被用作有用性的指标，但很少有研究来测试这一假设的有效性。在比较引用计数排名的期刊标题列表与根据使用频率排名的相同期刊列表（使用国家借阅图书馆调查的数据）时，发现两者之间的排名顺序相关性很低。这表明，通过引文分析产生的排名列表并不构成图书馆选择期刊的有效指南。
Lists of journals ranked according to number of citations received are frequently used as indicators of usefulness, but little research has been carried out to test the validity of this hypothesis. On comparing lists of titles of journals ranked by citation counting with lists of the same journals, ranked according to frequency of use (using data from a survey at the National Lending Library), it was found that the rank order correlation between the two was low. This suggests that ranked lists produced by analyses of citations do not constitute valid guides for journal selection by libraries.