Cohorts, Chronology, and Collective Memories
Cohorts, Chronology, and Collective Memories
复制标题
群体、年表和集体记忆
DOI：
10.1093/poq/nfh012
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
W. Rodgers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Schuman;W. Rodgers
我们请美国人告诉我们，自20世纪30年代以来，他们认为特别重要的国家和世界事件，使用1985年，2000年和2001年9月11日之后进行的重复横截面调查。我们的主要兴趣是，首先，集体记忆如何随着新事件的发生而变化，如冷战的结束或9/11恐怖袭击;其次，在青春期和成年早期的关键时期，这些记忆的起源，以及它们与教育的联系，是否随着时间的推移保持稳定并与理论相一致。作为我们调查的一部分，我们考虑了四个相关的问题：集体遗忘和集体记忆;回忆事件的容易程度和对其重要性的判断之间的区别;复合事件，它由可以被受访者单独记住的子事件组成;以及更大的社会和技术变化，这些变化很难或不可能以任何精确的方式来确定日期。第二次和第三次调查的小组数据是在9/11前后不久获得的，有助于确定哪些早期的集体记忆被恐怖袭击本身的记忆所取代。
We asked Americans to tell us the national and world events that they believe to have been especially important since the 1930s, using replicated cross-section surveys carried out in 1985, in 2000, and after September 11, 2001. Our primary interests are, first, in how collective memories change as new events occur, such as the end of the Cold War or the 9/11 terrorist attack; and second, in whether the origin of such memories during the critical period of adolescence and early adulthood, as well as their connection with education, remain stable over time and consistent with theory. As part of our investigation we consider four related issues: collective forgetting as well as collective remembering; the distinction between ease of recalling events and judgments of their importance; compound events, which are composed of sub-events that can be remembered separately by respondents; and larger social and technological changes difficult or impossible to date with any precision. Panel data from the second and third surveys, obtained shortly before and after 9/11, aid in determining which earlier collective memories were superseded by memories of the terrorist attack itself.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
J. Krosnick;D. Alwin
通讯作者：
J. Krosnick;D. Alwin