Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory

Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/026999396380240
复制
发表时间:
1996-05-01
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Jose, PE
Jose, PE
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Roseman, IJ;Antoniou, AA;Jose, PE

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

为了走向一个更准确的,完整的,情绪的原因,实证和综合理论。研究了与最近提出的评价理论有关的证据,并比较和检验了几种备选评价理论的假设。考虑到问题的重点是情绪的认知原因,而不是他们的现象学内容,182名受试者评价他们回忆的情绪体验的评价决定因素。结果表明,评价的意外(不意外/意外),情境状态(动机不一致/动机一致),动机状态(厌恶/食欲),概率(不确定/一定),控制潜力(低/高),问题源(非characteristological/characteristological因素),和机构(情况/其他人/自我),区分大量的广泛讨论的情绪。这些结果被用来制定一个修订后的,基于经验的,更全面的模型,指定哪些评价导致17种不同的情绪。
In order to move toward a more accurate, complete, and integrative theory of the causes of emotions, empirical. evidence relevant to a recently proposed appraisal theory was examined, and hypotheses from several alternative appraisal theories were compared and tested. Given questions that focused on the cognitive causes of emotions rather than their phenomenological contents, 182 subjects rated the appraisal determinants of emotion experiences that they recalled. Results suggest that appraisals of unexpectedness (not unexpected/unexpected), situational state (motive-inconsistent/motive-consistent), motivational state (aversive/appetitive), probability (uncertain/certain), control potential (low/high), problem source (non-characterological/characterological factors), and agency (circumstances/other person/self), differentiate a large number of widely-discussed emotions. These results are used to formulate a revised, empirically grounded, and more comprehensive model that specifies which appraisals cause 17 different emotions.