Review Essay — Helen Nissenbaum's Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (2010)
Review Essay — Helen Nissenbaum's Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (2010)
复制标题
评论文章 — 海伦·尼森鲍姆 (Helen Nissenbaum) 的隐私背景：技术、政策和社会生活的完整性 (2010)
DOI：
10.1017/s2071832200017168
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.3
通讯作者：
Tiffany Wong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tiffany Wong
社交媒体是现代社会生活中的主导力量，因为互联网技术已经占据了我们的网络驱动社会。正如下文将探讨的那样，许多学者都表达了对技术介导的文化中隐私重新配置的恐惧和热情。学术界的范围从那些反对新的隐私概念，赞成保护传统的私人/公共区别的权利，隐私作为一种值得专有保护的特权，到那些热衷于为信息打开闸门，重新发明甚至摧毁传统隐私区别的任何象征的人。这些两极变得更加突出的快速扩散的技术，如流行的社交网站，如Facebook，Twitter的，四方等说明在北美的辩论，隐私问题与这些发展进一步加剧了美国。S.最高法院最近的决定，纳尔逊诉美国宇航局，其中涉及政府的宪法权利，要求在国家安全和监视的背景下雇员的个人信息。
Social media is a dominating force in modern social life as internet technology has taken hold of our cyber-driven society. Many scholars, as will be explored below, have articulated fears and enthusiasm about what can be interpreted as a reconfiguration of privacy in a culture mediated by technology. Scholarship ranges from those opposing new conception of privacy in favour of protecting rights in traditional private/public distinctions with privacy as a privilege worthy of proprietary protection to those reveling in opening floodgates for information to re-invent or even destroy any semblance of traditional distinctions of privacy. These poles become even more accentuated in light of fast-proliferating technology illustrated by popular social networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter, Foursquare etc. In the North-American debate, the privacy concerns connected with these developments are compounded further by the U. S. Supreme Court's recent decision, Nelson v. NASA, which involves the constitutional right of government to ask for employee's personal information in the context of national security and surveillance.