All the Right Movements? Mediation, Rightist Movements, and Why US Movements Received Extensive Newspaper Coverage

All the Right Movements? Mediation, Rightist Movements, and Why US Movements Received Extensive Newspaper Coverage
复制标题

所有正确的动作?

DOI:
10.1093/sf/sox067
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
Alan Elliott, Thomas
Alan Elliott, Thomas
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Amenta, Edwin;Alan Elliott, Thomas

文献摘要

相似文献

在什么情况下,社会运动会被主流新闻媒体报道?新闻报道对于出于政治、文化和组织原因的运动很重要,但很少有学者在运动层面上对运动的报道进行比较分析。为了解决这一问题,我们将运动影响的政治调解模型应用于专业新闻媒体,使用了新闻社会组织视角的思想。从这个模型中,我们假设了四条主要的多原因路径来广泛报道运动。这些问题涉及两个具体的运动特征--破坏能力和广泛的组织--以及两个具体的政治背景--统一的党派制度和强制执行的政策。从认为右翼运动有不同决定因素的学术观点出发,我们还为它们的报道设计了假设。这些假设是通过对新闻数据集中最新的政治组织的定性比较分析来评估的。后者包括有关20世纪四大全国性报纸对美国全国运动组织的所有报道的信息。这些分析为调解模式提供了广泛的支持,并支持右翼运动有单独的、在某些方面更难获得广泛新闻报道的说法。
Under which conditions do social movements receive coverage by the mainstream news media? News coverage matters for movements for political, cultural, and organizational reasons, but only rarely have scholars analyzed the coverage of movements comparatively and at the movement level. To address the question, we apply a political mediation model of the influence of movements to professional news media, using ideas from the social organization of the news perspective. From this model, we hypothesize four main multicausal paths to extensive coverage for movements. These involve the joint occurrence of two specific movement characteristics—disruptive capacities and extensive organization—and two specific political contexts—unified partisan regimes and enforced policies. Working from scholarship that argues that rightist movements have different determinants, we also devise hypotheses for their coverage. These hypotheses are appraised through qualitative comparative analyses on an updated Political Organizations in the News data set. The latter includes information on all the coverage of national US movement organizations in four major national newspapers across the twentieth century. These analyses provide extensive support for the mediation model and support claims that rightist movements have separate and in some ways more difficult routes to extensive news coverage.