Mechanisms of auditory verbal hallucination in schizophrenia.
Mechanisms of auditory verbal hallucination in schizophrenia.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00155
复制
发表时间：
2013-11-27
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Wu W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cho R;Wu W
最近的工作机制的潜在听觉言语幻觉（AVH）已大量告知自我监测帐户，假设缺陷的内部监测机制的基础上AVH。一个更被忽视的替代方案是一个帐户，专注于缺陷的听觉处理，即自发激活帐户的听觉活动的基础AVH。科学往往通过理论的竞争来获得帮助。因此，系统地对比AVH的两种模型的讨论可以产生更尖锐的问题，这将导致新的调查途径。在本文中，我们提供了这样一个理论上的讨论，这两种模式之间的强烈对比。我们确定了一组挑战的自我监控帐户，并认为自发激活帐户有很多赞成它，应该是默认帐户。我们的理论概述导致新的问题和问题的解释AVH作为一种主观现象及其神经基础。因此，我们提出了一套实验策略，解剖AVH的潜在机制，在光的两个竞争模型。
Recent work on the mechanisms underlying auditory verbal hallucination (AVH) has been heavily informed by self-monitoring accounts that postulate defects in an internal monitoring mechanism as the basis of AVH. A more neglected alternative is an account focusing on defects in auditory processing, namely a spontaneous activation account of auditory activity underlying AVH. Science is often aided by putting theories in competition. Accordingly, a discussion that systematically contrasts the two models of AVH can generate sharper questions that will lead to new avenues of investigation. In this paper, we provide such a theoretical discussion of the two models, drawing strong contrasts between them. We identify a set of challenges for the self-monitoring account and argue that the spontaneous activation account has much in favor of it and should be the default account. Our theoretical overview leads to new questions and issues regarding the explanation of AVH as a subjective phenomenon and its neural basis. Accordingly, we suggest a set of experimental strategies to dissect the underlying mechanisms of AVH in light of the two competing models.