Dialogue, Activism, and Democratic Social Change
Dialogue, Activism, and Democratic Social Change
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01396.x
复制
发表时间：
2012-02-01
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Zoller, Heather M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ganesh, Shiv;Zoller, Heather M.
本文系统地描述了关于对话的各种立场及其对理解行动主义和社会变革的影响。它描述了三种走向对话的取向--集体主义、合作主义和对抗主义，这些取向是由关于对话的普遍性、差异的作用和权力概念的假设所区分的。我们主张对对话采取多方位、对抗性的视角，以激进主义中的权力和冲突问题为中心。这种观点阐明了广泛的社会变革的积极策略，而不是以共识为导向的方法。这些方法都说明了两个民族志案例研究，突出的重要性，奠定理论的行动主义和对话。
This article provides a systematic description of various positions on dialogue and their implications for understanding activism and social change. It describes three orientations toward dialoguecollaboration, co-optation, and agonismwhich are differentiated by assumptions regarding the pervasiveness of dialogue, the role of difference, and conceptions of power. We argue for a multivocal, agonistic perspective on dialogue that centers issues of power and conflict in activism. Such a perspective illuminates a broad range of activist tactics for social change instead of privileging consensus-oriented methods. These approaches are illustrated with two ethnographic case studies that highlight the importance of lay theories of activism and dialogue.