Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall

Dual-retrieval processes in free and associative recall
复制标题

DOI:
10.1006/jmla.2001.2796
复制
发表时间:
2002-01-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Payne, DG
Payne, DG
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brainerd, CJ;Wright, R;Payne, DG

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

最近的自由回忆的双重提取帐户假设,一个记忆目标可以通过直接访问其逐字痕迹或通过重建它从语义或其他关系信息,我们介绍了一个简单的范例。从经典的Estes RTT程序,分离直接访问和重建,并分离重建前的元认知判断过程,授权重建的目标输出,结果报告从四个实验,两个应用范例的自由回忆和两个扩展到联想回忆。主要的发现是:(a)通过使目标的表面形式更容易加工或将回忆集中在单个目标上的操作,直接访问得到了增强。(b)通过使目标的意义内容更容易加工或将回忆集中在目标组上的操作来增强重构,并且(c)这样的操作产生单错位,双解离。以及直接访问、重建和元认知判断之间的反向关联。我们将讨论如何利用这一范式来统一双检索概念的回忆和识别。(C)2001年,爱思唯尔科学。
Recent dual-retrieval accounts of free recall postulate that a memory target can be recalled either by directly accessing its verbatim trace or by reconstructing it from semantic or other relational information, We introduce a simple paradigm. derived from the classic Estes RTT procedure, that separates direct acess from reconstruction and that separates reconstruction front a metacognitive judgement process that authorizes reconstructed targets for output, Results are reported from four experiments, two that applied the paradigm to free recall and two that extended it to associative recall. The principal finding, were that (a) direct access was enhanced by manipulations that made targets' surface forms easier to process or that focused recall on individual targets. (b) reconstruction was enhanced by manipulations that made targets' meaning content easier to process or that focused recall on groups of targets, and (c) such manipulations produced single dislocations, double dissociations. and reversed associations between direct access, reconstruction, and metacognitive judgment. We discuss how this paradigm might be exploited to unify dual-retrieval conceptions of recall and recognition. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science.