Interleukin-11-induced heat shock protein 25 confers intestinal epithelial-specific cytoprotection from oxidant stress

Interleukin-11-induced heat shock protein 25 confers intestinal epithelial-specific cytoprotection from oxidant stress
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00282-8
复制
发表时间:
2003-05-01
期刊:
影响因子:
29.4
通讯作者:
Chang, EB
Chang, EB
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ropeleski, MJ;Tang, J;Chang, EB

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景与目的:白细胞介素-11(IL-11)在肠上皮损伤中的细胞保护机制尚不清楚。IL-11在氧化应激期间保护屏障完整性,氧化应激是多种类型的肠损伤(包括缺血和免疫介导的炎症)的共同终点。由于热休克蛋白(hsp)在肠上皮细胞中具有细胞保护作用,我们假设IL-11赋予的细胞保护作用是由诱导型hsp介导的。方法:IL-11受体(IL-11 R)的激活使用磷酸化特异性抗体STAT 3。通过免疫印迹法测定IEC-18隐窝和年轻成年小鼠结肠上皮细胞中IL-11对hsp 72和hsp 25的诱导。通过Cr-51释放测定上皮细胞对一氯胺氧化损伤的抗性。通过电穿孔和潮霉素B筛选获得稳定的hsp反义IEC-18细胞克隆。通过Triton X-100不溶性组分、2-D等电聚焦凝胶和共聚焦显微镜分析IL-11对hsp 25分布的影响。结果:在所研究的所有细胞中检测到IL-11 R信号。IL-11以肠上皮特异性方式诱导hsp 25,其在一氯胺存在下显著保持细胞活力。这种作用在稳定表达hsp 25反义的肠上皮细胞中被显著逆转。IL-11诱导hsp 25转移到含有细胞骨架元素的Triton X-100不溶性组分,这与hsp 25磷酸化的改变无关。通过共聚焦显微镜观察发现,热休克蛋白25与F-肌动蛋白共定位的增加并不能阻止这种变化。结论:IL-11诱导hsp 25表达。赋予上皮特异性细胞保护作用,其不依赖于hsp 25与F-肌动蛋白的磷酸化依赖性共定位,从而有助于IL-11在肠上皮损伤模型中的保护作用。
Background & Aims: The mechanisms of interleukin-11 (IL-11) cytoprotection in intestinal epithelial injury are largely unknown. IL-11 protects barrier integrity during oxidant stress, a common endpoint of numerous types of intestinal injury including ischemia and immune-mediated inflammation. Because heat shock proteins (hsp) are cytoprotective in intestinal epithelia, we hypothesized that IL-11- conferred cytoprotection is mediated by inducible hsps. Methods: IL-11 receptor (IL-11R) activation was determined using phospho-specific antibodies to STAT3. IL-11 induction of hsp72 and hsp25 was determined by immunoblot in IEC-18 crypt and young adult mouse colon colonic epithelial cells. Epithelial resistance to oxidant injury by monochloramine was determined by Cr-51 release. Stable hsp anti-sense IEC-18 cell clones were obtained by electroporation and hygromycin B selection. The IL-11 effect on hsp25 distribution was characterized by analysis of Triton X-100 insoluble fractions, 2-D isoelectric focusing gels, and confocal microscopy. Results: IL-11R signaling was detected in all cells under study. IL-11 induces hsp25 in an intestinal epithelial-specific manner that significantly preserves cellular viability in the presence of monochloramine. This effect was significantly reversed in intestinal epithelia stably expressing anti-sense to hsp25. IL-11 induced a shift of hsp25 to Triton X-100 insoluble fractions containing cytoskeletal elements, which was not associated with altered hsp25 phosphorylation. The shift was not paralleled by increased hsp25 co-localization with F-actin by confocal microscopy. Conclusions: The induction of hsp25 by IL-11. confers epithelial-specific cytoprotection that is independent of phosphorylation-dependent co-localization of hsp25 to F-actin, thereby contributing to the protective effects of IL-11 in models of intestinal epithelial injury.