Broadening scientific engagement and inclusivity in IPCC reports through collaborative technology platforms
Broadening scientific engagement and inclusivity in IPCC reports through collaborative technology platforms
复制标题
通过协作技术平台扩大 IPCC 报告中的科学参与和包容性
DOI：
10.1038/s44168-023-00072-3
复制
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
De-Gol A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
De-Gol A
关于气候变化的科学出版物越来越多，已经超出了个人跟上文献的能力，即使仅限于选定的副主题，如政府间气候变化专门委员会报告的章节。政府间气候变化专门委员会将受益于现代技术的协助、更多专家的参与和见解，以及更频繁的更新。在这里，我们描述如何定制技术以提供异步和互联平台，这些平台可以通过其可伸缩性和包容性的潜力来加强专家的协作，并帮助保持评估的最新。我们详细介绍了我们使用Science Brief.org平台的经验，该平台是在2017-2021年开发和使用的。我们表明，通过该平台及时发布简短的科学简报(例如关于野火的)，导致主流和社交媒体，包括面向政策的网站，对科学进行了广泛和准确的报道，因此有助于扩大公众对科学的了解和了解，并打击气候错误信息。虽然良好的视觉界面和用户流是必要的，但激励措施是专家参与平台的关键，虽然积极，但仍然很低。我们建议，像Science Brief这样的协作技术平台，为支持制定IPCC报告的现代化过程而量身定做，可以通过使评估更加公开和容易获得来极大地增强IPCC评估，进一步提高透明度。它还将能够全面纳入证据，并促进广泛和高质量的科学参与，包括来自世界各地的早期职业和科学家的参与。这可以首先在范围确定阶段进行测试。
The growing number of scientific publications on climate change has outstripped the capacity of individuals to keep up with the literature, even when confined to selected sub-topics such as chapter sections of IPCC reports. The IPCC would benefit from the assistance of modern technology, the engagement and insights of a far larger pool of experts, and more frequent updates. Here we describe how technology can be tailored to provide asynchronous and connected platforms that can enhance expert’s collaborations through their potential for scalability and inclusivity, and help keep assessments up-to-date. We detail our experience with the ScienceBrief.org platform, which was developed and used during 2017–2021. We show that the timely release of short scientific briefs (e.g. on wildfires), made possible by the platform, led to broad and accurate coverage of science in mainstream and social media, including policy-oriented websites, and therefore served to broaden public exposure and understanding of science, and counter climate misinformation. While a good visual interface and user flow were necessary, incentives were key for expert’s engagement with the platform, which, while positive, remained low. We suggest that a collaborative technology platform like ScienceBrief, tailored to support a modernised process of elaborating IPCC reports, could greatly enhance IPCC assessments by making them more open and accessible, further increasing transparency. It would also enable the comprehensive inclusion of evidence and facilitate broad and high-quality scientific engagement, including from early careers and scientists from around the world. This could first be tested at the scoping stage.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
23.8
作者：
Sharma, Ashish;Lin, Inna W.;Althoff, Tim
通讯作者：
Althoff, Tim
DOI：
10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609
发表时间：
2020-04
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
David Wadden;Kyle Lo;Lucy Lu Wang;Shanchuan Lin;Madeleine van Zuylen;Arman Cohan;Hannaneh Hajishirzi
通讯作者：
David Wadden;Kyle Lo;Lucy Lu Wang;Shanchuan Lin;Madeleine van Zuylen;Arman Cohan;Hannaneh Hajishirzi
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
A. Pullin;T. Knight
通讯作者：
T. Knight
加强全球环境评估的审查过程：IPCC 的案例
DOI：
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.012
发表时间：
2023
期刊：
Environmental Science & Policy
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Palutikof;S. Boulter;Christopher B. Field;K. Mach;M. Manning;M. Mastrandrea;L. Meyer;J. Minx;J. Pereira;G. Plattner;S. K. Ribeiro;Y. Sokona;F. Stadler;R. Swart
通讯作者：
R. Swart
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Carandang;RR;Sakamoto JL
通讯作者：
Sakamoto JL