Dosimetric comparison of an integrated multileaf-collimator versus a conventional collimator.
Dosimetric comparison of an integrated multileaf-collimator versus a conventional collimator.
复制标题
集成多叶准直器与传统准直器的剂量测定比较。
DOI:
10.1088/0031-9155/42/11/020
复制
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
A. Dutreix
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Georg;F. Julia;E. Briot;D. Huyskens;U. Wolff;A. Dutreix
The dosimetric characteristics of both a conventional GE collimator (CC) and a GE multileaf collimator (MLC) are compared for different photon beam energies. The integrated GE MLC consists of 32 pairs of tungsten leaves, replacing the lower pair of jaws of the conventional collimator. Measurements were performed with the conventional collimator before this collimator was replaced by the MLC. All parts of the accelerator except the collimator remained the same. Leakage and transmission measurements show good agreement with the manufacturer's specification, stating a leakage between leaves of less than 1% for all energies and a transmission through leaves of less than 0.5%. The dosimetric characteristics of both collimators are very similar for square and rectangular fields. No significant change in beam quality, beam attenuation and depth of maximum dose could be detected within the measurement accuracy. The MLC output ratio variation is smaller than the one measured with the CC. The penumbra difference in the Y direction is less than 0.5 mm at a depth of 5 cm in phantom; in the X direction the penumbra is 1 mm larger for the MLC due to the rounded leaf fronts. As the two leaf banks replace the lower pair of collimator jaws the distance from the collimator end to the isocentre is similar for the two collimators, therefore the MLC does not reduce the flexibility of the treatment unit. For symmetrical and regular collimator settings the MLC can be treated as the CC.
DOI:
10.1016/0360-3016(93)90337-u
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
影响因子:
--
作者:
LoSasso,T;Chui,CS;Kutcher,GJ;Leibel,SA;Fuks,Z;Ling,CC
通讯作者:
Ling,CC
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
SPIROU, SV;CHUI, CS
通讯作者:
CHUI, CS