Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non-Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters
Patterns of Citations of Open Access and Non-Open Access Conservation Biology Journal Papers and Book Chapters
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01509.x
复制
发表时间：
2010-06-01
影响因子：
6.3
通讯作者：
Bradley, J. Stuart
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Calver, Michael C.;Bradley, J. Stuart
开放获取（OA）出版，即作者、他们的机构或资助机构付费或提供一个存储库，通过该存储库可以免费在线获得同行评审的作品，这种出版被倡导为增加每篇论文的引用次数和广泛传播成果的模式，特别是向发展中国家的研究人员传播成果。我们比较了自 2000 年以来出版的 6 种期刊和 4 本书中 OA 和非 OA 论文的引用次数，以测试 OA 是否增加了总体引用次数以及发展中国家作者的引用次数。在控制论文类型（例如评论或研究论文）、论文长度、作者的引用概况、每篇论文的作者数量以及作者或出版商是否以 OA 方式发表论文后，OA 对每篇期刊论文的总引用次数没有统计上的显着影响。如果作者以前发表过高被引论文、是大型作者团队的成员或发表了相对较长的论文，则期刊论文被引用的频率会更高，但如果论文在 OA 来源中发表，则引用频率不会更高。尽管如此，作者存档的 OA 图书章节的引用次数比同一本书中未通过 OA 提供的章节高出八倍，这可能是因为图书章节没有在线摘要服务。也几乎没有证据表明，相对于未在 OA 中发表的期刊论文或书籍章节，在 OA 中发表的期刊论文或书籍章节受到发展中国家作者的更多引用。对于保护生物学的学术出版物，只有书籍章节具有 OA 引用优势，并且 OA 并没有增加发展中国家作者引用的论文或章节的数量。
Open access (OA) publishing, whereby authors, their institutions, or their granting bodies pay or provide a repository through which peer-reviewed work is available online for free, is championed as a model to increase the number of citations per paper and disseminate results widely, especially to researchers in developing countries. We compared the number of citations of OA and non-OA papers in six journals and four books published since 2000 to test whether OA increases number of citations overall and increases citations made by authors in developing countries. After controlling for type of paper (e. g., review or research paper), length of paper, authors' citation profiles, number of authors per paper, and whether the author or the publisher released the paper in OA, OA had no statistically significant influence on the overall number of citations per journal paper. Journal papers were cited more frequently if the authors had published highly cited papers previously, were members of large teams of authors, or published relatively long papers, but papers were not cited more frequently if they were published in an OA source. Nevertheless, author-archived OA book chapters accrued up to eight times more citations than chapters in the same book that were not available through OA, perhaps because there is no online abstracting service for book chapters. There was also little evidence that journal papers or book chapters published in OA received more citations from authors in developing countries relative to those journal papers or book chapters not published in OA. For scholarly publications in conservation biology, only book chapters had an OA citation advantage, and OA did not increase the number of citations papers or chapters received from authors in developing countries.