Lessons Learnt from China: National Multidisciplinary Healthcare Assistance.

Lessons Learnt from China: National Multidisciplinary Healthcare Assistance.
复制标题

DOI:
10.2147/rmhp.s269523
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Deng J
Deng J
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yang T;Shi H;Liu J;Deng J

文献摘要

相似文献

为了应对COVID-19的传播,中国采取了“国家多学科医疗救助”。本评论评估了遏制 COVID-19 是否有效且可持续。我们采用“双重差分法”来调查国家多学科医疗救助政策是否可以通过提高康复率来为受 COVID-19 影响的地区带来显着效益。总共578个面板数据样本取自中国卫生部。我们观察到,由于这一政策,每天的治愈病例增加了39.36例。人均GDP、土地面积与治愈人数显着负相关,常住人口与治愈人数显着正相关。国家多学科医疗救助是减轻 COVID-19 负担并缓解湖北省和中国医疗保健系统压力的有效干预措施。为快速制定和颁布有效的突发公共卫生危机应对政策,国家政府应将应急管理理念纳入政策议程,突出“问题流”的重要性。
In response to the transmission of COVID-19, China adopted the “national multidisciplinary healthcare assistance”. This commentary evaluates whether it is effective and sustainable to contain the COVID-19. We adopted the “Difference-in-difference Method” to investigate whether the national multidisciplinary healthcare assistance policy could provide significant benefits in areas affected by COVID-19 by increasing their recovery rates. A total of 578 panel data samples were taken from the Ministry of Health in China. We observed that the number of recovered cases per day increased by 39.36 as a result of this policy. GDP per capita and land area were significantly negatively correlated with the number of recovered cases while the resident population was significantly positively correlated with it. The national multidisciplinary healthcare assistance was an effective intervention to reduce the burden of COVID-19 and ease pressure on the healthcare system in Hubei and China. To quickly formulate and promulgate effective response policies for emergent public health crises, the national government should introduce the concept of emergency management into policy agendas and highlight the importance of “problem streams”.