On an Upward Trend: Reflection in Engineering Education
On an Upward Trend: Reflection in Engineering Education
复制标题
上升趋势：工程教育的反思
DOI：
10.18260/p.24533
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
C. Atman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lauren A. Sepp;M. Orand;J. Turns;Lauren D. Thomas Quigley;Brook Sattler;C. Atman
在本文中，我们感兴趣的是探索这样一个问题：反思在工程教育学术中得到了多少明确的、命名的关注，我们如何解释这些结果？我们对ASEE（美国工程教育学会）会议出版物进行了系统的文献综述，通过评估以某种方式涉及反思的论文数量，更好地了解反思在工程教育学术中的作用。在我们的搜索中，我们根据反思的范围（反思被提及的程度）和反思的类型（反思如何被操作）对出版物进行了分类。由于我们的研究结果，很明显，在整个ASEE会议出版物中，对反思的明确关注已经出现了显著的、可识别的上升趋势。了解跨文献反思的趋势可以帮助我们进一步分析其在工程教育界的普遍性和重要性。
In this paper, we are interested in exploring the question: how much explicit, named attention has reflection received in engineering education scholarship and how do we interpret these results? We conducted a systematic literature review of the ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) conference publications to better understand the role of reflection in engineering education scholarship through assessing the number of papers that involve reflection in some way. In our search, we categorized the publications by scope of reflection: the extent to which reflection is mentioned, and type of reflection: how reflection is being operationalized. As a result of our findings, it is evident that there has been a significant and recognizable upward trend in the explicit attention to reflection across the body of the ASEE conference publications. Understanding the trends of reflection across literature can help us further analyze its prevalence and importance in the engineering education community.