Transcribing toddler vocalizations: comparison of a modified naturalistic listening approach with phonetic transcription.

Transcribing toddler vocalizations: comparison of a modified naturalistic listening approach with phonetic transcription.
复制标题

转录幼儿发声:修改后的自然主义听力方法与语音转录的比较。

DOI:
10.1080/02699206.2022.2029574
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
HatchPollard,Sarah
HatchPollard,Sarah
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hardin-Jones,Mary;Heimbaugh,Libby;Chapman,KathyL;Baylis,Adriane;HatchPollard,Sarah

文献摘要

相似文献

以往的研究表明,自然主义听力在真实的时间(NLRT)可以用来评估可靠的语前发声,是更耗时比语音转录。目前的调查进行检查的对应关系的音节和辅音的信息获得使用修改后的自然主义听真实的时间(NLRT)的方法相比,广泛的语音音标为20名幼儿修复腭裂。每一个蹒跚学步的孩子都有一个40分钟的发声样本。两名听众独立地听每个录音,并使用NLRT编码每个幼儿产生的音节数和辅音类型。每个录音由每个听众在NLRT分析后2至16个月进行语音转录。改进的NSRT方法与音标法在识别音节和辅音方面具有较高的可靠性。在20名参与者中,两种类型的评估之间确定的音节和辅音的实际数量存在明显差异。对这些差异的可能解释进行了讨论。本研究结果表明,改进的NLRT程序是一个可靠的方法来确定辅音/库存的幼儿。它比传统的音标劳动强度低,并且在需要记录早期声音发育以支持早期干预决策时可能在临床上有用。
Previous investigations have demonstrated that naturalistic listening in real time (NLRT) can be used reliability to assess prelinguistic vocalizations and is less time-consuming than phonetic transcription. The current investigation was performed to examine the correspondence of syllable and consonant information obtained using a modified naturalistic listening in real time (NLRT) methodology compared to broad phonetic transcription for 20 toddlers with repaired cleft palate. A forty-minute vocalization sample was obtained for each toddler. Two listeners listened to each recording independently and coded the number of syllables and consonant types produced by each toddler using NLRT. Each recording was phonetically transcribed by each listener 2 to 16 months following the NLRT analysis. High reliability was evident between the modified NSRT method and phonetic transcription for identification of both syllables and consonants. Differences were evident in the actual number of syllables and consonants identified between the two types of assessment across the 20 participants. Possible explanations for those differences are addressed. The results of this investigation indicate that the modified NLRT procedure is a reliable method for determining consonant/inventories of young children. It is less labor intensive than traditional phonetic transcription and may be useful clinically when documentation of early sound development is needed to support early intervention decisions.