Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders:: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders
Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders:: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0021-843x.110.1.49
复制
发表时间：
2001-02-01
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Campbell, LA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown, TA;Di Nardo, PA;Campbell, LA
精神障碍诊断和统计手册（第4版）的可靠性DSM-IV;美国精神病学协会，1994年）的焦虑和情绪障碍进行了检查，在362名门诊患者进行了2个独立的管理的焦虑障碍访谈计划的DSM-IV：终身版（ADIS-IV-L）。对于大多数DSM-IV类别，获得了良好至极好的可靠性，对于许多疾病，不可靠性的常见来源是对组成症状是否在数量、严重程度或持续时间上足以满足DSM-IV诊断标准的分歧。这些分析还强调了一些疾病的潜在边界问题（例如，ADIS-IV-L临床评分（0-8级）分析表明，DSM-IV焦虑和心境障碍维度特征的评分者间一致性良好。研究结果进行了讨论方面的影响，情绪障碍的分类。
The reliability of current and lifetime Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) anxiety and mood disorders was examined in 362 outpatients who underwent 2 independent administrations of the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L). Good to excellent reliability was obtained for the majority of DSM-IV categories, For many disorders, a common source of unreliability was disagreements on whether constituent symptoms were sufficient in number, severity, or duration to meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. These analyses also highlighted potential boundary problems for some disorders (e.g., generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder), Analyses of ADIS-IV-L clinical ratings (0-8 scales) indicated favorable interrater agreement for the dimensional features of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders. The findings are discussed in regard to their implications for the classification of emotional disorders.