Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.

Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037//0278-7393.24.4.979
复制
发表时间:
1998-07
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Potter;Marvin M. Chun;Bradley S. Banks;Margaret Muckenhoupt
M. Potter;Marvin M. Chun;Bradley S. Banks;Margaret Muckenhoupt
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Potter;Marvin M. Chun;Bradley S. Banks;Margaret Muckenhoupt

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

当对干扰项中的两个目标以每项100ms的快速连续视觉呈现进行监控时,当第二个目标(T2)在第一个字母目标(T1)开始后200-500ms出现时,观众很难报告其出现:注意眨眼(AB;M.M.Chun&M.C.Potter,1995b;J.E.Raymond,K.L.Shapiro,&K.M.Arnell,1992)。听觉搜索也会出现同样的缺陷吗?比较了两种任务对听觉、视觉和跨通道目标的搜索:(A)在数字中识别2个目标字母(实验1-3和5)或在字母中识别数字(实验6);(B)在字母中识别1个数字并确定随后的字母中是否出现X(实验4)。在使用第一个任务的实验中,只有在两个目标都是可视的情况下才能找到标准AB。在第二个任务中,当选择集从T1变为T2时,无论目标通道如何,任务转换都会出现缺陷。
When monitoring a rapid serial visual presentation at 100 ms per item for 2 targets among distractors, viewers have difficulty reporting the 2nd target (T2) when it appears 200-500 ms after the onset of the 1st letter target (T1): an attentional blink (AB; M. M. Chun & M. C. Potter, 1995b; J. E. Raymond, K. L. Shapiro, & K. M. Arnell, 1992). Does the same deficit occur with auditory search? The authors compared search for auditory, visual, and cross-modal targets in 2 tasks: (a) identifying 2 target letters among digits (Experiments 1-3 and 5) or digits among letters (Experiment 6), and (b) identifying 1 digit among letters and deciding whether an X occurred among the subsequent letters (Experiment 4). In the experiments using the 1st task, the standard AB was found only when both targets were visual. In the 2nd task, with a change in selective set from T1 to T2, a task-switching deficit was obtained regardless of target modality.