Rumination as a Vulnerability Factor to Depression in Adolescents in Mainland China: Lifetime History of Clinically Significant Depressive Episodes
Rumination as a Vulnerability Factor to Depression in Adolescents in Mainland China: Lifetime History of Clinically Significant Depressive Episodes
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15374416.2010.517159
复制
发表时间：
2010-01-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Starrs, Claire
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hong, Wei;Abela, John R. Z.;Starrs, Claire
本研究检验了抑郁反应风格理论的易感性和性别差异假设（Nolen-Hoeksema，1991）。参与者包括494名十年级的学生（M=15.25岁，SD=0.47）从两所中学在北京，中国招募。参与者完成自我报告措施评估反刍和神经质，以及半结构化的临床访谈评估当前和过去的临床显着抑郁发作。即使在控制了神经质之后，更高水平的反刍与表现出当前抑郁发作和过去抑郁发作史的可能性更大有关。即使在控制了神经质之后，更高水平的沉思也与当前抑郁发作的严重程度和持续时间以及过去抑郁发作的严重程度有关。与反应风格理论的性别差异假设相反，女孩和男孩在反刍水平上没有差异。
The current study tested the vulnerability and sex differences hypotheses of the response styles theory of depression (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991). Participants included 494 tenth-grade students (M=15.25 years, SD=0.47) recruited from two secondary schools in Beijing, China. Participants completed self-report measures assessing rumination and neuroticism as well as a semistructured clinical interview assessing current and past clinically significant depressive episodes. Higher levels of rumination were associated with a greater likelihood of exhibiting both a current depressive episode and a past history of depressive episodes even after controlling for neuroticism. Higher levels of rumination were also associated with greater severity and duration of current depressive episodes and greater severity of past depressive episodes even after controlling for neuroticism. Contrary to the sex differences hypothesis of the response styles theory, girls and boys did not differ in levels of rumination.