Low-energy Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Repeated Annually: Rationale for the COAST Trial.
Low-energy Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Repeated Annually: Rationale for the COAST Trial.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/ijg.0000000000001788
复制
发表时间:
2021-07-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Kass M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Realini T;Gazzard G;Latina M;Kass M
At the 2018 annual meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), Stephano Gandolfi presented a retrospective study of his patients at the University of Parma, Italy, in which a regimen of low-energy selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) repeated annually irrespective of intraocular pressure (IOP) produced significantly longer medication-free survival than standard SLT repeated as needed, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or high-risk ocular hypertension (OHTN). Specifically, newly-diagnosed POAG eyes were treated primarily either with ALT 360° performed once, standard SLT 360° repeated as needed at standard energy, and low-energy 360° SLT (0.4 mJ/spot x 50–60 spots) repeated annually at low energy regardless of IOP. After 10 years of follow-up, medication-free rates were 22.6% in the ALT group, 25.0% in the standard SLT group, and 58.3% in the low-energy SLT group (p<0.001). The median times to medication were 2.8 years, 3.2 years, and 6.2 years, respectively. In light of the recent Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT) publication, in which primary SLT was shown to be at least as effective as medical therapy in newly-diagnosed and treatment naïve patients with mild-moderate POAG or high-risk OHTN and the likelihood of a paradigm shift toward a laser-first regimen, Gandolfi’s data suggested that the long-term utility of SLT in glaucoma management may be improvable by altering the energy level and frequency at which SLT is performed. These intriguing observations led us to conduct a comprehensive review of the SLT literature in search of a basis for the biological plausibility of such an approach. The results of that literature review, summarized herein, prompted application to the National Eye Institute (NEI) at the National Institutes of Health for funding to conduct a pair of multicenter randomized trials to evaluate outcomes of SLT performed annually at low energy. These trials—collectively named the Clarifying the Optimal Application of SLT Therapy (COAST) trial—were funded in late 2020 by NEI to compare standard versus low-energy primary SLT and annual versus pro re nata (PRN) repeat SLT and are currently in the pre-enrollment phase. In this report, we share the background and rationale that informed the design of the COAST trial.