Indicating mediatization? Two decades of election campaign television coverage
Indicating mediatization? Two decades of election campaign television coverage
复制标题
表示媒体化？
DOI：
10.1177/0267323113475409
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
D. Hopmann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Zeh;D. Hopmann
本文追溯了丹麦和德国电视新闻在过去20年(1990-2009年)对竞选活动报道的中介化。这一分析是基于对两国主要候选人的新闻内容分析。考虑到丹麦和德国是相似但又不同的国家，这些数据在选举的报道以及随着时间的推移而变化方面显示出惊人的相似之处。观察赛马报道、个人化、视觉化和消极面的数量，大多数发现乍一看符合中介假说。乍一看，控制其他重要变量的多变量分析证实了所研究的五个内容指标中只有三个是调解化的概念。此外，调解进程显然在1990年代停滞不前。
This article traces mediatization in the coverage of election campaigns in Danish and German television news over the past 20 years (1990–2009). The analysis is based on news content analyses focusing on the major candidates in the two countries. Considering that Denmark and Germany are similar but nevertheless different countries, the data show remarkable similarities in the coverage of elections and how it changes over time. Observing the amount of horse-race coverage, personalization, visualization and negativity, most findings fitted the mediatization hypothesis at a first glance. At a second glance, multivariate analyses controlling for important other variables confirmed the notion of mediatization for only three of the five content indicators studied. In addition, the mediatization process apparently stalled in the 1990s.