Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Irinotecan Compared With Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AIO KRK-0104-A Randomized Trial of the German AIO CRC Study Group

Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Irinotecan Compared With Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AIO KRK-0104-A Randomized Trial of the German AIO CRC Study Group
复制标题

DOI:
10.1200/jco.2010.31.1936
复制
发表时间:
2011-03-01
影响因子:
45.3
通讯作者:
Heinemann, Volker
Heinemann, Volker
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Moosmann, Nicolas;von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer;Heinemann, Volker

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究目的:AIO KRK-0104随机II期临床试验研究了西妥昔单抗联合卡培他滨和伊立替康(CAPIRI)或卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(CAPOX)一线治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效和安全性。(第1天400 mg/m2,随后每周250 mg/m2)+CAPIRI(伊立替康200 mg/m2,第1天;卡培他滨800 mg/m2,每日两次,第1天至第14天,每3周一次;或西妥昔单抗加CAPOX(奥沙利铂130 mg/m2,第1天;卡培他滨1,000 mg/m2,每日两次,第1天至第14天,每3周一次)。主要研究终点是客观反应率(ORR)。结果在意向治疗患者人群(n = 177)中,CAPIRI加西妥昔单抗的ORR为46%(95%CI,35至57),CAPOX加西妥昔单抗的ORR为48%(95%CI,37至59)。在81.4%的意向治疗人群中进行了KRAS基因突变状态分析。CAPIRI+西妥昔单抗组KRAS野生型患者的ORR为50.0%,PFS为6.2个月,OS为21.1个月。在CAPOX+西妥昔单抗组中,观察到ORR为44.9%,PFS为7.1个月,OS为23.5个月。虽然KRAS野生型和突变亚组的ORR和PFS相当,但生存期更长的趋势与KRAS野生型相关。这两种方案都有可管理的毒性档案和safe.ConclusionThis随机试验表明,除了西妥昔单抗CAPIRI或CAPOX是有效和安全的一线治疗mCRC。在分析的治疗方案中,ORR和PFS不因KRAS基因突变状态而异。J Clin Oncol 29:1050-1058. (c)2011年美国临床肿瘤学会
PurposeThe AIO KRK-0104 randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Patients and MethodsA total of 185 patients with mCRC were randomly assigned to cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) day 1, followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), day 1; capecitabine 800 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1 through 14, every 3 weeks; or cetuximab plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1; capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily day 1 through 14, every 3 weeks). The primary study end point was objective response rate (ORR).ResultsIn the intention-to-treat patient population (n = 177), ORR was 46% (95% CI, 35 to 57) for CAPIRI plus cetuximab versus 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59) for CAPOX plus cetuximab. Analysis of the KRAS gene mutation status was performed in 81.4% of the intention to treat population. Patients with KRAS wild-type in the CAPIRI plus cetuximab arm showed an ORR of 50.0%, a PFS of 6.2 months and an OS of 21.1 months. In the CAPOX plus cetuximab arm, an ORR of 44.9%, a PFS of 7.1 months and an OS of 23.5 months were observed. While ORR and PFS were comparable in KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, a trend toward longer survival was associated with KRAS wild-type. Both regimens had manageable toxicity profiles and were safe.ConclusionThis randomized trial demonstrates that the addition of cetuximab to CAPIRI or CAPOX is effective and safe in first-line treatment of mCRC. In the analyzed regimens, ORR and PFS did not differ according to KRAS gene mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29:1050-1058. (c) 2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology