Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in a community managed care setting.

Sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer in a community managed care setting.
复制标题

在社区管理护理环境中对乳腺癌进行前哨淋巴结切除术。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
The cancer journal from Scientific American
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Tan Lr
Tan Lr
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Guenther Jm;M. Krishnamoorthy;Tan Lr

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的 评价术中淋巴标测和前哨淋巴结切除术(IOLM/SL)在社区管理的乳腺癌患者分期中的可行性、准确性和可重复性。 患者和方法 对145例原发性乳腺癌患者进行了为期26个月的前瞻性研究。他们在原发性乳腺癌部位接受了活体染料注射。追踪淋巴通道至前哨淋巴结,切除前哨淋巴结,连续切片并检查。然后进行I级和II级腋窝淋巴结清扫和确定性乳房手术。 结果 145例手术中有103例(71.0%)发现前哨淋巴结。103例中100例(97.1%)前哨淋巴结与非前哨淋巴结一致。3例患者(9.7%)有假阴性前哨淋巴结;在最后80例患者中没有。在28个阳性前哨淋巴结中,12个(42.9%)代表腋窝内唯一的含肿瘤淋巴结。前哨淋巴结中肿瘤的检出率显著高于非前哨淋巴结(33/50,66.0%vs54/467,11.6%,P < 0.0001)。IOLM/SL比标准腋窝淋巴结清扫术发现更多的微转移(< 2 mm)(13/33,39.6%比4/177,2.2%,P < 0.001)。42例前哨淋巴结不能被识别的患者中有9例(21.4%)有5个或更多的淋巴结转移。6例Tis原发灶患者中有2例有淋巴结转移。 讨论 IOLM/SL可准确识别最可能包含转移性疾病的前哨淋巴结。存在手术学习曲线。不成功的IOLM/SL是相当大的淋巴结转移的风险因素。无肿瘤前哨淋巴结的IOLM/SL可能需要进行正式的腋窝淋巴结清扫。该技术是可行的,经济的,并在社区管理的护理设施的背景下,可重复的,而不是把严格的要求,手术室,病理学,或核医学人员。
PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy (IOLM/SL) in the staging of breast cancer patients in a community managed care setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred forty-five patients with primary breast cancer were prospectively studied over a 26-month period. They underwent vital dye injection at their primary breast cancer site. Lymphatic channels were traced to the sentinel lymph node, which was excised, serially sectioned, and examined. A level I and II axillary lymph node dissection and definitive breast surgery were then performed. RESULTS Sentinel nodes were identified in 103 of 145 procedures (71.0%). Sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes were concordant in 100 of 103 cases (97.1%). Three patients (9.7%) had falsely negative sentinel nodes; there were none in the last 80 patients. Of 28 positive sentinel nodes, 12 (42.9%) represented the only tumor-containing node within the axilla. Sentinel nodes were significantly more likely to contain tumor than nonsentinel nodes (33/50, 66.0% vs 54/467, 11.6%, P < 0.0001). IOLM/SL identified more micrometastases (< 2 mm) than standard axillary lymph node dissection (13/33, 39.6% vs 4/177, 2.2%, P < 0.001). Nine of 42 patients (21.4%) whose sentinel node could not be identified had five or more nodal metastases. Two of six patients with presumed Tis primaries had nodal metastases. DISCUSSION IOLM/SL accurately identifies the sentinel lymph node(s) most likely to contain metastatic disease. A procedural learning curve was present. An unsuccessful IOLM/SL was a risk factor for considerable nodal metastases. IOLM/SL with a tumor-free sentinel node may obviate a formal axillary lymph node dissection. The technique was feasible, economical, and reproducible within the context of a community managed care facility, while not placing exacting demands on operating room, pathology, or nuclear medicine personnel.