Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking.

Understanding health literacy measurement through eye tracking.
复制标题

通过眼动追踪了解健康素养测量。

DOI:
10.1080/10810730.2013.825666
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Weiss BD
Weiss BD
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mackert M;Champlin SE;Pasch KE;Weiss BD

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这项研究使用眼球跟踪技术来探索不同健康素养水平的人是如何将与健康相关的信息可视化的。作者招募了25名大学行政人员(更有可能具有足够的健康素养技能)和25名参加成人扫盲计划的成年人(更有可能健康素养技能有限)。作者对每个参与者进行了最新的生命体征(NVS)健康素养评估。评估包括让个人在查看营养标签时回答有关该标签的问题。作者使用计算机化的眼球跟踪技术来衡量每个参与者花在关注与所提问题相关的营养标签信息上的时间,以及他们花在查看无关信息上的时间。结果表明,较低的NVS得分与花费在与回答NVS项目无关的信息上的时间显著相关。这一发现表明,改进健康素养衡量的努力不仅应包括区分解释和使用健康信息有困难的人的能力,还应包括区分那些找到相关信息有困难的人的能力。此外,这一发现表明,健康教育材料应该最大限度地减少包括无关信息。
This study used eye-tracking technology to explore how individuals with different levels of health literacy visualize health-related information. The authors recruited 25 university administrative staff (more likely to have adequate health literacy skills) and 25 adults enrolled in an adult literacy program (more likely to have limited health literacy skills). The authors administered the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) health literacy assessment to each participant. The assessment involves having individuals answer questions about a nutrition label while viewing the label. The authors used computerized eye-tracking technology to measure the amount of time each participant spent fixing their view at nutrition label information that was relevant to the questions being asked and the amount of time they spent viewing nonrelevant information. Results showed that lower NVS scores were significantly associated with more time spent on information not relevant for answering the NVS items. This finding suggests that efforts to improve health literacy measurement should include the ability to differentiate not just between individuals who have difficulty interpreting and using health information, but also between those who have difficulty finding relevant information. In addition, this finding suggests that health education material should minimize the inclusion of nonrelevant information.
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-116
发表时间: 2013-02-07
期刊: BMC public health
影响因子: 4.5
作者:
Rowlands G;Khazaezadeh N;Oteng-Ntim E;Seed P;Barr S;Weiss BD
通讯作者: Weiss BD
DOI: 10.2190/de.40.3.b
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 0.8
作者:
Peterson, Emily Bylund;Thomsen, Steven;John, Kevin
通讯作者: John, Kevin
DOI: 10.1007/bf02640361
发表时间: 1995-10-01
影响因子: 5.7
作者:
PARKER, RM;BAKER, DW;NURSS, JR
通讯作者: NURSS, JR
DOI: 10.7182/pit2013473
发表时间: 2013-03-01
影响因子: 0.8
作者:
Escobedo, Wendy;Weismuller, Penny
通讯作者: Weismuller, Penny
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.896
发表时间: 2010-07-07
影响因子: 120.7
作者:
Powers, Benjamin J.;Trinh, Jane V.;Bosworth, Hayden B.
通讯作者: Bosworth, Hayden B.