Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma
Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/hep.510270140
复制
发表时间:
1998-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
13.5
通讯作者:
Sherman, M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Collier, J;Sherman, M
In contrast to certain other cancers, 1-4 screening for liver cancer has become, at least among hepatologists, an accepted part of the management of patients with end-stage liver disease. Yet there have been no randomized, controlled trials of screening or surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nor are there adequate analyses of cost, efficacy, and potential benefit. It is the intent of this article to critically examine the rationale for screening patients with liver disease for liver cancer.By definition, screening is the one-time application of a test that allows the detection of a disease at a stage when intervention may significantly improve the natural course and outcome. 5 In contrast, surveillance is the repeated application of such tests over time. The objective of both is to reduce disease-specific mortality. Prorok5 has enunciated the criteria by which any screening/surveillance program can be judged: 1) The disease must be common and have a substantial mortality and morbidity. 2) The target population must be easily identifiable, and there must be an expectation that the physicians caring for the population will accept that screening is necessary and that the population will answer the call for screening. 3) The screening test must have a low morbidity and a high sensitivity and specificity. 4) There must be standardized recall procedures. 5) The screening test must be acceptable to the target population. 6) Finally, and most importantly, there must be an acceptable and effective therapy. In this article, we will examine HCC in light of these criteria, and we will discuss some of the challenges to instituting effective screening/surveillance programs for HCC.