Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling

Value of information in sequential decision making: Component inspection, permanent monitoring and system-level scheduling
复制标题

信息在顺序决策中的价值:组件检查、永久监控和系统级调度

DOI:
10.1016/j.ress.2016.05.014
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Pozzi
M. Pozzi
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Milad Memarzadeh;M. Pozzi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们说明了如何评估信息的价值(VOI)的顺序决策问题建模的部分可观察马尔可夫决策过程(POMDPs)。POMDPs提供了一个通用的框架,用于建模的基础设施组件的管理,包括操作和维护,当只有部分或嘈杂的意见; VoI是一个关键的概念,选择探索性的行动,与组件的检查和监控的应用程序。此外,组件级VoI可以作为一个有效的启发式分配优先级系统级的检查调度。我们介绍了两种替代模型的信息的可用性,并得出在这些设置中的每一个的VoI:随机分配(SA)模型假设,观察收集与给定的概率,而基于费用的分配模型(FA)假设,他们是在给定的成本。在组件级提出这些模型后,我们研究它们如何执行系统级检查调度。
We illustrate how to assess the Value of Information (VoI) in sequential decision making problems modeled by Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs). POMDPs provide a general framework for modeling the management of infrastructure components, including operation and maintenance, when only partial or noisy observations are available; VoI is a key concept for selecting explorative actions, with application to component inspection and monitoring. Furthermore, component-level VoI can serve as an effective heuristic for assigning priorities to system-level inspection scheduling. We introduce two alternative models for the availability of information, and derive the VoI in each of those settings: the Stochastic Allocation (SA) model assumes that observations are collected with a given probability, while the Fee-based Allocation model (FA) assumes that they are available at a given cost. After presenting these models at component-level, we investigate how they perform for system-level inspection scheduling.