Participant descriptions of guilt and shame

Participant descriptions of guilt and shame
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/bf00992963
复制
发表时间:
1983-03
影响因子:
4.8
通讯作者:
F. Wicker;Glen C. Payne;R. D. Morgan
F. Wicker;Glen C. Payne;R. D. Morgan
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Wicker;Glen C. Payne;R. D. Morgan

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这项研究的目的是看看天真的评分者是否能以与情绪理论家描述一致的方式区分内疚和羞耻。在两项研究中,152名参与者回忆了他们经历过内疚或羞耻的场合,并在大量的量表上对这些经历进行了评分,这些量表要么代表了情绪的基本维度,要么代表了之前假设的区分这两种情绪的属性。羞耻和内疚情境在许多属性上有所不同,包括感到强大、自我控制、自我意识和暴露、活动、自卑、惊讶、与他人疏远、面部感觉、正义的自我归因和对惩罚的预期。这两个概念在意义上也有许多共同点,最重要的是在疼痛、紧张和兴奋等基本属性方面。结果与之前关于内疚和羞耻之间本质差异的几个描述一致,但并非所有这些描述都一致。
The purpose of this research was to see if naive raters could distinguish between guilt and shame in ways consistent with the descriptions of emotion theorists. In two studies, 152 participants recalled occasions on which they had experienced guilt or shame and rated these experiences on a large number of scales that represented either basic dimensions of emotion or attributes previously postulated to differentiate between these two emotions. Shame and guilt situations differed on a number of attributes, including felt powerfulness, self-control, self-consciousness and exposure, activity, inferiority, surprise, alienation from others, facial sensation, self-attribution of justice, and expectation of punishment. Many commonalities in the meaning of the two concepts were also suggested, most importantly in terms of basic attributes such as pain, tension, and arousal. Results were consistent with several previous accounts of the essential differences between guilt and shame, but not with all such descriptions.