The philosophy of modelling or does the philosophy of biology have any use?
The philosophy of modelling or does the philosophy of biology have any use?
复制标题
建模哲学或者生物学哲学有什么用吗？
DOI：
10.1098/rstb.2011.0265
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Orzack,StevenHecht
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Orzack,StevenHecht
生物学家在寻找现实世界问题的答案，如全球变暖的生态后果，物种保护计划的设计，理解景观动态和理解基因表达，不断做出决定，这些决定是基于“哲学”的立场，如何创建和测试对观察到的现象的解释。不管是好是坏，某种哲学是生物学研究中不可或缺的一部分。鉴于此，现在比以往任何时候都更重要的是，对哲学对生物学家的真正意义和应该意义进行实际评估。在这里，我解决三个问题：生物学家是否应该注意“哲学”;生物学家是否应该注意“生物学哲学”;生物学家是否应该注意关于建模的生物学哲学文献？我描述了为什么最后一个问题很容易肯定地回答，附带条件是，生物学家从这些文献中获得的实际利益将与生物学家将“哲学”理解为生物学的一部分而不是与生物学分开的程度成正比。
Biologists in search of answers to real-world issues such as the ecological consequences of global warming, the design of species' conservation plans, understanding landscape dynamics and understanding gene expression make decisions constantly that are based on a ‘philosophical’ stance as to how to create and test explanations of an observed phenomenon. For better or for worse, some kind of philosophy is an integral part of the doing of biology. Given this, it is more important than ever to undertake a practical assessment of what philosophy does mean and should mean to biologists. Here, I address three questions: should biologists pay any attention to ‘philosophy’; should biologists pay any attention to ‘philosophy of biology’; and should biologists pay any attention to the philosophy of biology literature on modelling? I describe why the last question is easily answered affirmatively, with the proviso that the practical benefits to be gained by biologists from this literature will be directly proportional to the extent to which biologists understand ‘philosophy’ to be a part of biology, not apart from biology.